Views from the inside: An outsider's perspective

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

It isn't easy to maintain a balance among the actions that promote program improvement and those that protect a fledgling program from rapid extinction. Activities such as rigorous self-evaluation, reflective analysis of one's own practice and that of one's colleagues, or sharing data that are both positive and negative, are not likely to occur without an agreement among faculty and administrators to create and sustain a nondefensive environment in which participants work collaboratively toward continuous improvement. Time, resources, ideological differences, competing goals, and the absence of historical, organizational, or cultural norms for surfacing issues and problems often implicitly and explicitly discourage open discussions of processes and outcomes of practice (Argyris, Putnam, & McClain-Smith, 1987; Clift, Veal, Holland, Johnson, & McCarthy, 1995). Furthermore, the creation of a positive, enthusiastic image for a new program is often necessary in order to maintain institutional, financial, and personal commitment to the program. As a set, the chapters in Part 3 strive for an appropriate balance between advocacy for and critical reflection on Unified Elementary and Special Education Proteach (UESEP). It is very, very unusual for faculty from across departments to come together to plan, implement, and critically evaluate themselves, one another, and the program. It is even more unusual that they would share their data and their thoughts publicly. The authors provide us with a critical insiders' perspective that foregrounds the diversity among perspectives that one can find at many, if not most, large teacher-education programs at research-intensive institutions. As a faculty member working in a university much like the University of Florida, I will provide an outsider's view in the role of critical friend. I was an undergraduate in the secondary program at the University of Florida in the late '60's and early '70's. During this time, the elementary program offered students the option of working individually to learn a given skill or body of knowledge through a series of tasks and activities. At the end of the unit, or activity, the student would demonstrate competency on the content and objectives of the activity and begin another one. Not only was Florida one of the leaders in the competency- based teacher education movement, it was also a major site for the process-product research on effective teaching behaviors, under the direction of Robert Soar and colleagues (Brophy & Good, 1986). Those of us who were in secondary education (like our peers in the elementary program) were steeped in the humanistic tradition of teacher education (Combs, 1974). We were taught to create our units and plans with little or no reliance on a textbook; we were encouraged to think of ways to encourage self-actualization (Maslow, 1968). In the mid-'80's I reconnected with Florida when the university developed Proteach, a program based on research on effective teaching that also encouraged the development of reflective practice (Ross, 1990). At the time, faculty members from many teacher-education programs were meeting at conferences to discuss how we might encourage and assess reflective activity. Clearly, the University of Florida College of Education has been and still is a place where innovations in teacher education were valued and where research on teaching and teacher education is the norm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPreparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform
PublisherState University of New York Press
Pages195-205
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)0791463575, 9780791463574
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

teacher
education
Teaching
elementary education
university
secondary education
special education
textbook
student
commitment
leader
innovation
evaluation
resources
knowledge
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Clift, R. T. (2005). Views from the inside: An outsider's perspective. In Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform (pp. 195-205). State University of New York Press.

Views from the inside : An outsider's perspective. / Clift, Renee T.

Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform. State University of New York Press, 2005. p. 195-205.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Clift, RT 2005, Views from the inside: An outsider's perspective. in Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform. State University of New York Press, pp. 195-205.
Clift RT. Views from the inside: An outsider's perspective. In Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform. State University of New York Press. 2005. p. 195-205
Clift, Renee T. / Views from the inside : An outsider's perspective. Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform. State University of New York Press, 2005. pp. 195-205
@inbook{0431cde9f7aa432b82511a38c962e90e,
title = "Views from the inside: An outsider's perspective",
abstract = "It isn't easy to maintain a balance among the actions that promote program improvement and those that protect a fledgling program from rapid extinction. Activities such as rigorous self-evaluation, reflective analysis of one's own practice and that of one's colleagues, or sharing data that are both positive and negative, are not likely to occur without an agreement among faculty and administrators to create and sustain a nondefensive environment in which participants work collaboratively toward continuous improvement. Time, resources, ideological differences, competing goals, and the absence of historical, organizational, or cultural norms for surfacing issues and problems often implicitly and explicitly discourage open discussions of processes and outcomes of practice (Argyris, Putnam, & McClain-Smith, 1987; Clift, Veal, Holland, Johnson, & McCarthy, 1995). Furthermore, the creation of a positive, enthusiastic image for a new program is often necessary in order to maintain institutional, financial, and personal commitment to the program. As a set, the chapters in Part 3 strive for an appropriate balance between advocacy for and critical reflection on Unified Elementary and Special Education Proteach (UESEP). It is very, very unusual for faculty from across departments to come together to plan, implement, and critically evaluate themselves, one another, and the program. It is even more unusual that they would share their data and their thoughts publicly. The authors provide us with a critical insiders' perspective that foregrounds the diversity among perspectives that one can find at many, if not most, large teacher-education programs at research-intensive institutions. As a faculty member working in a university much like the University of Florida, I will provide an outsider's view in the role of critical friend. I was an undergraduate in the secondary program at the University of Florida in the late '60's and early '70's. During this time, the elementary program offered students the option of working individually to learn a given skill or body of knowledge through a series of tasks and activities. At the end of the unit, or activity, the student would demonstrate competency on the content and objectives of the activity and begin another one. Not only was Florida one of the leaders in the competency- based teacher education movement, it was also a major site for the process-product research on effective teaching behaviors, under the direction of Robert Soar and colleagues (Brophy & Good, 1986). Those of us who were in secondary education (like our peers in the elementary program) were steeped in the humanistic tradition of teacher education (Combs, 1974). We were taught to create our units and plans with little or no reliance on a textbook; we were encouraged to think of ways to encourage self-actualization (Maslow, 1968). In the mid-'80's I reconnected with Florida when the university developed Proteach, a program based on research on effective teaching that also encouraged the development of reflective practice (Ross, 1990). At the time, faculty members from many teacher-education programs were meeting at conferences to discuss how we might encourage and assess reflective activity. Clearly, the University of Florida College of Education has been and still is a place where innovations in teacher education were valued and where research on teaching and teacher education is the norm.",
author = "Clift, {Renee T}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0791463575",
pages = "195--205",
booktitle = "Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform",
publisher = "State University of New York Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Views from the inside

T2 - An outsider's perspective

AU - Clift, Renee T

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - It isn't easy to maintain a balance among the actions that promote program improvement and those that protect a fledgling program from rapid extinction. Activities such as rigorous self-evaluation, reflective analysis of one's own practice and that of one's colleagues, or sharing data that are both positive and negative, are not likely to occur without an agreement among faculty and administrators to create and sustain a nondefensive environment in which participants work collaboratively toward continuous improvement. Time, resources, ideological differences, competing goals, and the absence of historical, organizational, or cultural norms for surfacing issues and problems often implicitly and explicitly discourage open discussions of processes and outcomes of practice (Argyris, Putnam, & McClain-Smith, 1987; Clift, Veal, Holland, Johnson, & McCarthy, 1995). Furthermore, the creation of a positive, enthusiastic image for a new program is often necessary in order to maintain institutional, financial, and personal commitment to the program. As a set, the chapters in Part 3 strive for an appropriate balance between advocacy for and critical reflection on Unified Elementary and Special Education Proteach (UESEP). It is very, very unusual for faculty from across departments to come together to plan, implement, and critically evaluate themselves, one another, and the program. It is even more unusual that they would share their data and their thoughts publicly. The authors provide us with a critical insiders' perspective that foregrounds the diversity among perspectives that one can find at many, if not most, large teacher-education programs at research-intensive institutions. As a faculty member working in a university much like the University of Florida, I will provide an outsider's view in the role of critical friend. I was an undergraduate in the secondary program at the University of Florida in the late '60's and early '70's. During this time, the elementary program offered students the option of working individually to learn a given skill or body of knowledge through a series of tasks and activities. At the end of the unit, or activity, the student would demonstrate competency on the content and objectives of the activity and begin another one. Not only was Florida one of the leaders in the competency- based teacher education movement, it was also a major site for the process-product research on effective teaching behaviors, under the direction of Robert Soar and colleagues (Brophy & Good, 1986). Those of us who were in secondary education (like our peers in the elementary program) were steeped in the humanistic tradition of teacher education (Combs, 1974). We were taught to create our units and plans with little or no reliance on a textbook; we were encouraged to think of ways to encourage self-actualization (Maslow, 1968). In the mid-'80's I reconnected with Florida when the university developed Proteach, a program based on research on effective teaching that also encouraged the development of reflective practice (Ross, 1990). At the time, faculty members from many teacher-education programs were meeting at conferences to discuss how we might encourage and assess reflective activity. Clearly, the University of Florida College of Education has been and still is a place where innovations in teacher education were valued and where research on teaching and teacher education is the norm.

AB - It isn't easy to maintain a balance among the actions that promote program improvement and those that protect a fledgling program from rapid extinction. Activities such as rigorous self-evaluation, reflective analysis of one's own practice and that of one's colleagues, or sharing data that are both positive and negative, are not likely to occur without an agreement among faculty and administrators to create and sustain a nondefensive environment in which participants work collaboratively toward continuous improvement. Time, resources, ideological differences, competing goals, and the absence of historical, organizational, or cultural norms for surfacing issues and problems often implicitly and explicitly discourage open discussions of processes and outcomes of practice (Argyris, Putnam, & McClain-Smith, 1987; Clift, Veal, Holland, Johnson, & McCarthy, 1995). Furthermore, the creation of a positive, enthusiastic image for a new program is often necessary in order to maintain institutional, financial, and personal commitment to the program. As a set, the chapters in Part 3 strive for an appropriate balance between advocacy for and critical reflection on Unified Elementary and Special Education Proteach (UESEP). It is very, very unusual for faculty from across departments to come together to plan, implement, and critically evaluate themselves, one another, and the program. It is even more unusual that they would share their data and their thoughts publicly. The authors provide us with a critical insiders' perspective that foregrounds the diversity among perspectives that one can find at many, if not most, large teacher-education programs at research-intensive institutions. As a faculty member working in a university much like the University of Florida, I will provide an outsider's view in the role of critical friend. I was an undergraduate in the secondary program at the University of Florida in the late '60's and early '70's. During this time, the elementary program offered students the option of working individually to learn a given skill or body of knowledge through a series of tasks and activities. At the end of the unit, or activity, the student would demonstrate competency on the content and objectives of the activity and begin another one. Not only was Florida one of the leaders in the competency- based teacher education movement, it was also a major site for the process-product research on effective teaching behaviors, under the direction of Robert Soar and colleagues (Brophy & Good, 1986). Those of us who were in secondary education (like our peers in the elementary program) were steeped in the humanistic tradition of teacher education (Combs, 1974). We were taught to create our units and plans with little or no reliance on a textbook; we were encouraged to think of ways to encourage self-actualization (Maslow, 1968). In the mid-'80's I reconnected with Florida when the university developed Proteach, a program based on research on effective teaching that also encouraged the development of reflective practice (Ross, 1990). At the time, faculty members from many teacher-education programs were meeting at conferences to discuss how we might encourage and assess reflective activity. Clearly, the University of Florida College of Education has been and still is a place where innovations in teacher education were valued and where research on teaching and teacher education is the norm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895586845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895586845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84895586845

SN - 0791463575

SN - 9780791463574

SP - 195

EP - 205

BT - Preparing for Inclusive Teaching: Meeting The Challenges of Teacher Education Reform

PB - State University of New York Press

ER -