Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception

Keith R. Kluender, Andrew J Lotto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nearey's 'double-weak' approach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3241-3254 (1997)] advocates a pattern-recognition model in answer to fundamental problems of speech perception. Both theoretically and empirically, there is much to recommend double-weak. However, there is some question whether this approach avoids long-standing disagreement with respect to the objects of speech perception. In addition, the descriptive power of even relatively simple empiricist models such as Nearey's can mislead with respect to fundamental articulatory and auditory processes underlying speech perception. Here, the positive contributions are celebrated, and several cautionary observations-germane to broader questions of experience and learning-are offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-511
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pattern recognition
learning
Speech Perception
Empiricist
Perils
Fundamental
Pattern Recognition
Descriptive
Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception. / Kluender, Keith R.; Lotto, Andrew J.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 105, No. 1, 01.1999, p. 503-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64525bc0762c413aacddcdcf00138893,
title = "Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception",
abstract = "Nearey's 'double-weak' approach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3241-3254 (1997)] advocates a pattern-recognition model in answer to fundamental problems of speech perception. Both theoretically and empirically, there is much to recommend double-weak. However, there is some question whether this approach avoids long-standing disagreement with respect to the objects of speech perception. In addition, the descriptive power of even relatively simple empiricist models such as Nearey's can mislead with respect to fundamental articulatory and auditory processes underlying speech perception. Here, the positive contributions are celebrated, and several cautionary observations-germane to broader questions of experience and learning-are offered.",
author = "Kluender, {Keith R.} and Lotto, {Andrew J}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.424587",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "503--511",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception

AU - Kluender, Keith R.

AU - Lotto, Andrew J

PY - 1999/1

Y1 - 1999/1

N2 - Nearey's 'double-weak' approach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3241-3254 (1997)] advocates a pattern-recognition model in answer to fundamental problems of speech perception. Both theoretically and empirically, there is much to recommend double-weak. However, there is some question whether this approach avoids long-standing disagreement with respect to the objects of speech perception. In addition, the descriptive power of even relatively simple empiricist models such as Nearey's can mislead with respect to fundamental articulatory and auditory processes underlying speech perception. Here, the positive contributions are celebrated, and several cautionary observations-germane to broader questions of experience and learning-are offered.

AB - Nearey's 'double-weak' approach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3241-3254 (1997)] advocates a pattern-recognition model in answer to fundamental problems of speech perception. Both theoretically and empirically, there is much to recommend double-weak. However, there is some question whether this approach avoids long-standing disagreement with respect to the objects of speech perception. In addition, the descriptive power of even relatively simple empiricist models such as Nearey's can mislead with respect to fundamental articulatory and auditory processes underlying speech perception. Here, the positive contributions are celebrated, and several cautionary observations-germane to broader questions of experience and learning-are offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032919067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032919067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.424587

DO - 10.1121/1.424587

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032919067

VL - 105

SP - 503

EP - 511

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 1

ER -