Visual search of mammographic images: Influence of lesion subtlety

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study is to determine whether mammographic lesion subtlety influences the detection accuracy and visual search parameters of radiologists. Materials and Methods. Six radiologists searched a set of 20 mammograms with at least two lesions per image (masses and/or microcalcifications). Eye position was recorded. False-negative (FN) and true-positive (TP) decisions were correlated with lesion subtlety and visual search parameters of time to first hit, total dwell time, and number of return fixations. Results. Lesions with lower subtlety ratings were detected later in the search than more obvious ones (FN later than TP decisions). When subtler lesions were detected (TP), dwell time was longer than for more obvious lesions, but FN decisions received shorter total dwell. Subtler lesions, when detected (TP), received more total fixation clusters than more obvious ones, but FN decisions received fewer. Conclusion. Subtle mammographic lesions are associated with significantly different visual search parameters than obvious lesions, explaining in part why they are missed more often. Developing tools to improve lesion visibility may improve detection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-969
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume12
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Calcinosis
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Lesion subtlety
  • Mammography
  • Visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Visual search of mammographic images : Influence of lesion subtlety. / Krupinski, Elizabeth A.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 12, No. 8, 08.2005, p. 965-969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b93aa3367d0a45159e473f9b43ff5657,
title = "Visual search of mammographic images: Influence of lesion subtlety",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study is to determine whether mammographic lesion subtlety influences the detection accuracy and visual search parameters of radiologists. Materials and Methods. Six radiologists searched a set of 20 mammograms with at least two lesions per image (masses and/or microcalcifications). Eye position was recorded. False-negative (FN) and true-positive (TP) decisions were correlated with lesion subtlety and visual search parameters of time to first hit, total dwell time, and number of return fixations. Results. Lesions with lower subtlety ratings were detected later in the search than more obvious ones (FN later than TP decisions). When subtler lesions were detected (TP), dwell time was longer than for more obvious lesions, but FN decisions received shorter total dwell. Subtler lesions, when detected (TP), received more total fixation clusters than more obvious ones, but FN decisions received fewer. Conclusion. Subtle mammographic lesions are associated with significantly different visual search parameters than obvious lesions, explaining in part why they are missed more often. Developing tools to improve lesion visibility may improve detection.",
keywords = "Lesion subtlety, Mammography, Visual search",
author = "Krupinski, {Elizabeth A}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "965--969",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual search of mammographic images

T2 - Influence of lesion subtlety

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study is to determine whether mammographic lesion subtlety influences the detection accuracy and visual search parameters of radiologists. Materials and Methods. Six radiologists searched a set of 20 mammograms with at least two lesions per image (masses and/or microcalcifications). Eye position was recorded. False-negative (FN) and true-positive (TP) decisions were correlated with lesion subtlety and visual search parameters of time to first hit, total dwell time, and number of return fixations. Results. Lesions with lower subtlety ratings were detected later in the search than more obvious ones (FN later than TP decisions). When subtler lesions were detected (TP), dwell time was longer than for more obvious lesions, but FN decisions received shorter total dwell. Subtler lesions, when detected (TP), received more total fixation clusters than more obvious ones, but FN decisions received fewer. Conclusion. Subtle mammographic lesions are associated with significantly different visual search parameters than obvious lesions, explaining in part why they are missed more often. Developing tools to improve lesion visibility may improve detection.

AB - Rationale and Objectives. The goal of this study is to determine whether mammographic lesion subtlety influences the detection accuracy and visual search parameters of radiologists. Materials and Methods. Six radiologists searched a set of 20 mammograms with at least two lesions per image (masses and/or microcalcifications). Eye position was recorded. False-negative (FN) and true-positive (TP) decisions were correlated with lesion subtlety and visual search parameters of time to first hit, total dwell time, and number of return fixations. Results. Lesions with lower subtlety ratings were detected later in the search than more obvious ones (FN later than TP decisions). When subtler lesions were detected (TP), dwell time was longer than for more obvious lesions, but FN decisions received shorter total dwell. Subtler lesions, when detected (TP), received more total fixation clusters than more obvious ones, but FN decisions received fewer. Conclusion. Subtle mammographic lesions are associated with significantly different visual search parameters than obvious lesions, explaining in part why they are missed more often. Developing tools to improve lesion visibility may improve detection.

KW - Lesion subtlety

KW - Mammography

KW - Visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23644449892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23644449892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.071

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.071

M3 - Article

C2 - 16023379

AN - SCOPUS:23644449892

VL - 12

SP - 965

EP - 969

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 8

ER -