Vitamin D deficiency predicts prostate biopsy outcomes

Adam B. Murphy, Yaw Nyame, Iman K. Martin, William J. Catalona, Courtney M.P. Hollowell, Robert B. Nadler, James M. Kozlowski, Kent T. Perry, Andre Kajdacsy-Balla, Rick Kittles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The association between vitamin D and prostate biopsy outcomes has not been evaluated. We examine serum vitamin D levels with prostate biopsy results in men with an abnormal prostate-specific antigen and/or digital rectal examination. Experimental Design: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) was obtained from 667 men, ages 40 to 79 years, prospectively enrolled from Chicago urology clinics undergoing first prostate biopsy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between 25-OH D status and incident prostate cancer, Gleason score, and tumor stage. Results: Among European American (EA) men, there was an association of 25-OH D <12 ng/mL with higher Gleason score≥4+4 [OR, 3.66;95%confidence interval (CI), 1.41-9.50; P=0.008] and tumor stage [stage≥cT2b vs. ≤cT2a, OR, 2.42 (1.14-5.10); P=0.008]. In African American (AA) men, we find increased odds of prostate cancer diagnosis on biopsy with 25-OHD< 20 ng/mL [OR, 2.43 (1.20-4.94); P=0.01]. AA men demonstrated an association between 25-OH D < 12 ng/mL and Gleason ≥ 4+4 [OR, 4.89 (1.59-15.07); P=0.006]. There was an association with tumor stage≥cT2b vs.≤cT2a [OR, 4.22 (1.52-11.74); P= 0.003]. Conclusions: In AA men, vitamin D deficiency was associated with increased odds of prostate cancer diagnosis on biopsy. In both EA and AAmen, severe deficiency was positively associated with higher Gleason grade and tumor stage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2289-2299
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Vitamin D deficiency predicts prostate biopsy outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this