Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review

Paul Kei Matsuda, Christine - Tardy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some researchers have argued that voice is irrelevant to academic writing and that the importance of voice has been overstated in the professional literature [Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003); Stapleton, P. (2002)]. To investigate whether and how a socially oriented notion of voice-defined as "the amalgamative effect of the use of discursive and non-discursive features that language users choose, deliberately or otherwise, from socially available yet ever-changing repertoires" [Matsuda, P.K. (2001)]-plays a role in academic writing, this study examined the construction of an author's discursive identity by peer reviewers in a simulated blind manuscript review process for an academic journal in the field of rhetoric and composition. The analysis of the written reviews as well as interviews with the two reviewers and the manuscript author indicated that the reviewers' constructions of the author's voice are related to their stance toward the author. The findings suggest that voice does play a role in academic writing and that there is a need for further research into the issue of identity construction from the perspectives of both writers and readers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-249
Number of pages15
JournalEnglish for Specific Purposes
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Park, R.
rhetoric
writer
interview
language
Manuscripts
Rhetoric
Academic Writing
Reviewers
Discursive
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Voice in academic writing : The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. / Matsuda, Paul Kei; Tardy, Christine -.

In: English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2007, p. 235-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9d01ec764914a60b9c756b2f21f7bdd,
title = "Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review",
abstract = "Some researchers have argued that voice is irrelevant to academic writing and that the importance of voice has been overstated in the professional literature [Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003); Stapleton, P. (2002)]. To investigate whether and how a socially oriented notion of voice-defined as {"}the amalgamative effect of the use of discursive and non-discursive features that language users choose, deliberately or otherwise, from socially available yet ever-changing repertoires{"} [Matsuda, P.K. (2001)]-plays a role in academic writing, this study examined the construction of an author's discursive identity by peer reviewers in a simulated blind manuscript review process for an academic journal in the field of rhetoric and composition. The analysis of the written reviews as well as interviews with the two reviewers and the manuscript author indicated that the reviewers' constructions of the author's voice are related to their stance toward the author. The findings suggest that voice does play a role in academic writing and that there is a need for further research into the issue of identity construction from the perspectives of both writers and readers.",
author = "Matsuda, {Paul Kei} and Tardy, {Christine -}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "235--249",
journal = "English for Specific Purposes",
issn = "0889-4906",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voice in academic writing

T2 - The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review

AU - Matsuda, Paul Kei

AU - Tardy, Christine -

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Some researchers have argued that voice is irrelevant to academic writing and that the importance of voice has been overstated in the professional literature [Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003); Stapleton, P. (2002)]. To investigate whether and how a socially oriented notion of voice-defined as "the amalgamative effect of the use of discursive and non-discursive features that language users choose, deliberately or otherwise, from socially available yet ever-changing repertoires" [Matsuda, P.K. (2001)]-plays a role in academic writing, this study examined the construction of an author's discursive identity by peer reviewers in a simulated blind manuscript review process for an academic journal in the field of rhetoric and composition. The analysis of the written reviews as well as interviews with the two reviewers and the manuscript author indicated that the reviewers' constructions of the author's voice are related to their stance toward the author. The findings suggest that voice does play a role in academic writing and that there is a need for further research into the issue of identity construction from the perspectives of both writers and readers.

AB - Some researchers have argued that voice is irrelevant to academic writing and that the importance of voice has been overstated in the professional literature [Helms-Park, R., & Stapleton, P. (2003); Stapleton, P. (2002)]. To investigate whether and how a socially oriented notion of voice-defined as "the amalgamative effect of the use of discursive and non-discursive features that language users choose, deliberately or otherwise, from socially available yet ever-changing repertoires" [Matsuda, P.K. (2001)]-plays a role in academic writing, this study examined the construction of an author's discursive identity by peer reviewers in a simulated blind manuscript review process for an academic journal in the field of rhetoric and composition. The analysis of the written reviews as well as interviews with the two reviewers and the manuscript author indicated that the reviewers' constructions of the author's voice are related to their stance toward the author. The findings suggest that voice does play a role in academic writing and that there is a need for further research into the issue of identity construction from the perspectives of both writers and readers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847660128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847660128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847660128

VL - 26

SP - 235

EP - 249

JO - English for Specific Purposes

JF - English for Specific Purposes

SN - 0889-4906

IS - 2

ER -