Volatility in daily relationship quality

The roles of attachment and gender

Ashley N. Cooper, Casey J. Totenhagen, Brandon T. McDaniel, Melissa A Curran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research on attachment orientations has focused on how attachment is associated with levels of relationship quality; however, the nature of associations with variability over time (volatility) on relationship quality remains unclear. Couples who are higher in volatility have poorer relationship outcomes, thus it is important to understand factors that influence volatility. We used 7-day daily diaries with both members of 157 heterosexual couples to analyze associations between actor and partner reports of attachment anxiety and avoidance and gender in associations with both general levels of relationship quality and volatility in daily relationship quality. Overall, we found that regardless of gender, attachment avoidance was linked with decreased levels of relationship quality for both actors and partners. Gender differences in volatility of daily relationship quality emerged such that women’s attachment influenced both their own and their male partner’s volatility. Women’s attachment anxiety was positively associated with volatility for both their own and their partner’s relationship quality. Women’s attachment avoidance was also negatively associated with volatility in their partner’s relationship quality. We discuss how attachment avoidance is a greater predictor for average levels of daily relationship quality, whereas attachment anxiety drives volatility in daily feelings about the relationship. Further, conflict is an important factor to consider in these links between attachment anxiety and volatility in relationship quality; on days when individuals reported greater conflict than usual, they reported lower relationship quality, and this association was stronger for those whose partners were high in attachment anxiety. We explore implications for research and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-371
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Volatilization
gender
Anxiety
anxiety
partner relationship
Heterosexuality
Research
Emotions
gender-specific factors

Keywords

  • APIM
  • attachment
  • daily diary
  • intraindividual variability
  • relationship quality
  • volatility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Volatility in daily relationship quality : The roles of attachment and gender. / Cooper, Ashley N.; Totenhagen, Casey J.; McDaniel, Brandon T.; Curran, Melissa A.

In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 348-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooper, Ashley N. ; Totenhagen, Casey J. ; McDaniel, Brandon T. ; Curran, Melissa A. / Volatility in daily relationship quality : The roles of attachment and gender. In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 348-371.
@article{fb35fd1d398c4855830c6374747d69cd,
title = "Volatility in daily relationship quality: The roles of attachment and gender",
abstract = "Previous research on attachment orientations has focused on how attachment is associated with levels of relationship quality; however, the nature of associations with variability over time (volatility) on relationship quality remains unclear. Couples who are higher in volatility have poorer relationship outcomes, thus it is important to understand factors that influence volatility. We used 7-day daily diaries with both members of 157 heterosexual couples to analyze associations between actor and partner reports of attachment anxiety and avoidance and gender in associations with both general levels of relationship quality and volatility in daily relationship quality. Overall, we found that regardless of gender, attachment avoidance was linked with decreased levels of relationship quality for both actors and partners. Gender differences in volatility of daily relationship quality emerged such that women’s attachment influenced both their own and their male partner’s volatility. Women’s attachment anxiety was positively associated with volatility for both their own and their partner’s relationship quality. Women’s attachment avoidance was also negatively associated with volatility in their partner’s relationship quality. We discuss how attachment avoidance is a greater predictor for average levels of daily relationship quality, whereas attachment anxiety drives volatility in daily feelings about the relationship. Further, conflict is an important factor to consider in these links between attachment anxiety and volatility in relationship quality; on days when individuals reported greater conflict than usual, they reported lower relationship quality, and this association was stronger for those whose partners were high in attachment anxiety. We explore implications for research and practice.",
keywords = "APIM, attachment, daily diary, intraindividual variability, relationship quality, volatility",
author = "Cooper, {Ashley N.} and Totenhagen, {Casey J.} and McDaniel, {Brandon T.} and Curran, {Melissa A}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0265407517690038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "348--371",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volatility in daily relationship quality

T2 - The roles of attachment and gender

AU - Cooper, Ashley N.

AU - Totenhagen, Casey J.

AU - McDaniel, Brandon T.

AU - Curran, Melissa A

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Previous research on attachment orientations has focused on how attachment is associated with levels of relationship quality; however, the nature of associations with variability over time (volatility) on relationship quality remains unclear. Couples who are higher in volatility have poorer relationship outcomes, thus it is important to understand factors that influence volatility. We used 7-day daily diaries with both members of 157 heterosexual couples to analyze associations between actor and partner reports of attachment anxiety and avoidance and gender in associations with both general levels of relationship quality and volatility in daily relationship quality. Overall, we found that regardless of gender, attachment avoidance was linked with decreased levels of relationship quality for both actors and partners. Gender differences in volatility of daily relationship quality emerged such that women’s attachment influenced both their own and their male partner’s volatility. Women’s attachment anxiety was positively associated with volatility for both their own and their partner’s relationship quality. Women’s attachment avoidance was also negatively associated with volatility in their partner’s relationship quality. We discuss how attachment avoidance is a greater predictor for average levels of daily relationship quality, whereas attachment anxiety drives volatility in daily feelings about the relationship. Further, conflict is an important factor to consider in these links between attachment anxiety and volatility in relationship quality; on days when individuals reported greater conflict than usual, they reported lower relationship quality, and this association was stronger for those whose partners were high in attachment anxiety. We explore implications for research and practice.

AB - Previous research on attachment orientations has focused on how attachment is associated with levels of relationship quality; however, the nature of associations with variability over time (volatility) on relationship quality remains unclear. Couples who are higher in volatility have poorer relationship outcomes, thus it is important to understand factors that influence volatility. We used 7-day daily diaries with both members of 157 heterosexual couples to analyze associations between actor and partner reports of attachment anxiety and avoidance and gender in associations with both general levels of relationship quality and volatility in daily relationship quality. Overall, we found that regardless of gender, attachment avoidance was linked with decreased levels of relationship quality for both actors and partners. Gender differences in volatility of daily relationship quality emerged such that women’s attachment influenced both their own and their male partner’s volatility. Women’s attachment anxiety was positively associated with volatility for both their own and their partner’s relationship quality. Women’s attachment avoidance was also negatively associated with volatility in their partner’s relationship quality. We discuss how attachment avoidance is a greater predictor for average levels of daily relationship quality, whereas attachment anxiety drives volatility in daily feelings about the relationship. Further, conflict is an important factor to consider in these links between attachment anxiety and volatility in relationship quality; on days when individuals reported greater conflict than usual, they reported lower relationship quality, and this association was stronger for those whose partners were high in attachment anxiety. We explore implications for research and practice.

KW - APIM

KW - attachment

KW - daily diary

KW - intraindividual variability

KW - relationship quality

KW - volatility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041284121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041284121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265407517690038

DO - 10.1177/0265407517690038

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 348

EP - 371

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 3

ER -