Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding

Myles J. Watts, Joseph Atwood, Bruce R Beattie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that with a binding resource constraint, such as water rights in the western United States, policy instruments that are effective in reducing water degradation associated with irrigated agriculture are likely to differ from those policies found effective in the absence of resource constraints. Under plausible circumstances, modest increases in per unit water charges will have no effect upon hectares irrigated or per hectare water application rates. Higher annual irrigation setup costs such as higher irrigated land taxes will result in reduced irrigated hectares with increased water applied per irrigated hectare and more chemical application per irrigated hectare. Such adjustments have the potential to exacerbate water contamination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalWater Resources and Economics
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

irrigation
farm
water
degradation
resource
environmental pollution
resources
taxes
agriculture
costs
cost

Keywords

  • Irrigation
  • Production economics
  • Water degradation
  • Water rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding. / Watts, Myles J.; Atwood, Joseph; Beattie, Bruce R.

In: Water Resources and Economics, Vol. 9, 01.01.2015, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9dc5919413b54f91bb073cff993019e1,
title = "Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding",
abstract = "This paper demonstrates that with a binding resource constraint, such as water rights in the western United States, policy instruments that are effective in reducing water degradation associated with irrigated agriculture are likely to differ from those policies found effective in the absence of resource constraints. Under plausible circumstances, modest increases in per unit water charges will have no effect upon hectares irrigated or per hectare water application rates. Higher annual irrigation setup costs such as higher irrigated land taxes will result in reduced irrigated hectares with increased water applied per irrigated hectare and more chemical application per irrigated hectare. Such adjustments have the potential to exacerbate water contamination.",
keywords = "Irrigation, Production economics, Water degradation, Water rights",
author = "Watts, {Myles J.} and Joseph Atwood and Beattie, {Bruce R}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wre.2014.11.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Water Resources and Economics",
issn = "2212-4284",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Water degradation implications when whole-farm irrigation water is binding

AU - Watts, Myles J.

AU - Atwood, Joseph

AU - Beattie, Bruce R

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper demonstrates that with a binding resource constraint, such as water rights in the western United States, policy instruments that are effective in reducing water degradation associated with irrigated agriculture are likely to differ from those policies found effective in the absence of resource constraints. Under plausible circumstances, modest increases in per unit water charges will have no effect upon hectares irrigated or per hectare water application rates. Higher annual irrigation setup costs such as higher irrigated land taxes will result in reduced irrigated hectares with increased water applied per irrigated hectare and more chemical application per irrigated hectare. Such adjustments have the potential to exacerbate water contamination.

AB - This paper demonstrates that with a binding resource constraint, such as water rights in the western United States, policy instruments that are effective in reducing water degradation associated with irrigated agriculture are likely to differ from those policies found effective in the absence of resource constraints. Under plausible circumstances, modest increases in per unit water charges will have no effect upon hectares irrigated or per hectare water application rates. Higher annual irrigation setup costs such as higher irrigated land taxes will result in reduced irrigated hectares with increased water applied per irrigated hectare and more chemical application per irrigated hectare. Such adjustments have the potential to exacerbate water contamination.

KW - Irrigation

KW - Production economics

KW - Water degradation

KW - Water rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923108748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923108748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wre.2014.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.wre.2014.11.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923108748

VL - 9

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Water Resources and Economics

JF - Water Resources and Economics

SN - 2212-4284

ER -