Web-Based and mHealth Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Prevention: A Systematic Review

Elizabeth J. Anderson, Keegan C. Krause, Caitlin Meyer Krause, Abby Welter, D. Jean McClelland, David O. Garcia, Kacey Ernst, Elise C. Lopez, Mary P. Koss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used across health programming including intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention to optimize screening, educational outreach, and linkages to care via telehealth. We systematically evaluated current web-based and mHealth interventions, which include web- or mobile-based delivery methods for primary, secondary, and tertiary IPV victimization prevention. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for empirical studies published 1998–2019. Studies were included if they considered empirical data, participants in adult romantic relationships, IPV as a primary or secondary outcome, and an mHealth component. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to record critical ratings of quality among studies selected for inclusion. We assessed variation in targeted populations, types of IPV addressed, and mHealth approaches used. Of 133 studies identified for full-text review, 31 were included. Computer-based screening with or without integrated education was the most common mHealth approach (n = 8, 26%), followed by safety decision aids (n = 7, 23%). Feasibility and acceptability were found to be generally high where assessed (23% of studies, n = 7). There was limited evidence around whether mHealth interventions better addressed population needs compared to conventional interventions. mHealth tools for IPV prevention are especially acceptable in health-care settings, on mobile phone platforms, or when connecting victims to health care. Despite enthusiasm in pilot projects, evidence for efficacy compared to conventional IPV prevention approaches is limited. A major strength of mHealth IPV prevention programming is the ability to tailor interventions to individual victim needs without extensive human resource expenditure by providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrauma, Violence, and Abuse
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
Telemedicine
victimization
violence
health
programming
health care
Delivery of Health Care
partner relationship
Intimate Partner Violence
decision aid
Biomedical Technology
Cell Phones
Decision Support Techniques
pilot project
Health Expenditures
PubMed
MEDLINE
human resources
search engine

Keywords

  • intimate partner violence
  • mHealth
  • mobile health
  • violence prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Web-Based and mHealth Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Prevention : A Systematic Review. / Anderson, Elizabeth J.; Krause, Keegan C.; Meyer Krause, Caitlin; Welter, Abby; McClelland, D. Jean; Garcia, David O.; Ernst, Kacey; Lopez, Elise C.; Koss, Mary P.

In: Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, Elizabeth J. ; Krause, Keegan C. ; Meyer Krause, Caitlin ; Welter, Abby ; McClelland, D. Jean ; Garcia, David O. ; Ernst, Kacey ; Lopez, Elise C. ; Koss, Mary P. / Web-Based and mHealth Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Prevention : A Systematic Review. In: Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. 2019.
@article{8a22beb58d2140ec89b6c89115ccc8f9,
title = "Web-Based and mHealth Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Prevention: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used across health programming including intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention to optimize screening, educational outreach, and linkages to care via telehealth. We systematically evaluated current web-based and mHealth interventions, which include web- or mobile-based delivery methods for primary, secondary, and tertiary IPV victimization prevention. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for empirical studies published 1998–2019. Studies were included if they considered empirical data, participants in adult romantic relationships, IPV as a primary or secondary outcome, and an mHealth component. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to record critical ratings of quality among studies selected for inclusion. We assessed variation in targeted populations, types of IPV addressed, and mHealth approaches used. Of 133 studies identified for full-text review, 31 were included. Computer-based screening with or without integrated education was the most common mHealth approach (n = 8, 26{\%}), followed by safety decision aids (n = 7, 23{\%}). Feasibility and acceptability were found to be generally high where assessed (23{\%} of studies, n = 7). There was limited evidence around whether mHealth interventions better addressed population needs compared to conventional interventions. mHealth tools for IPV prevention are especially acceptable in health-care settings, on mobile phone platforms, or when connecting victims to health care. Despite enthusiasm in pilot projects, evidence for efficacy compared to conventional IPV prevention approaches is limited. A major strength of mHealth IPV prevention programming is the ability to tailor interventions to individual victim needs without extensive human resource expenditure by providers.",
keywords = "intimate partner violence, mHealth, mobile health, violence prevention",
author = "Anderson, {Elizabeth J.} and Krause, {Keegan C.} and {Meyer Krause}, Caitlin and Abby Welter and McClelland, {D. Jean} and Garcia, {David O.} and Kacey Ernst and Lopez, {Elise C.} and Koss, {Mary P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1524838019888889",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Trauma, Violence, and Abuse",
issn = "1524-8380",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Web-Based and mHealth Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Prevention

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Anderson, Elizabeth J.

AU - Krause, Keegan C.

AU - Meyer Krause, Caitlin

AU - Welter, Abby

AU - McClelland, D. Jean

AU - Garcia, David O.

AU - Ernst, Kacey

AU - Lopez, Elise C.

AU - Koss, Mary P.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used across health programming including intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention to optimize screening, educational outreach, and linkages to care via telehealth. We systematically evaluated current web-based and mHealth interventions, which include web- or mobile-based delivery methods for primary, secondary, and tertiary IPV victimization prevention. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for empirical studies published 1998–2019. Studies were included if they considered empirical data, participants in adult romantic relationships, IPV as a primary or secondary outcome, and an mHealth component. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to record critical ratings of quality among studies selected for inclusion. We assessed variation in targeted populations, types of IPV addressed, and mHealth approaches used. Of 133 studies identified for full-text review, 31 were included. Computer-based screening with or without integrated education was the most common mHealth approach (n = 8, 26%), followed by safety decision aids (n = 7, 23%). Feasibility and acceptability were found to be generally high where assessed (23% of studies, n = 7). There was limited evidence around whether mHealth interventions better addressed population needs compared to conventional interventions. mHealth tools for IPV prevention are especially acceptable in health-care settings, on mobile phone platforms, or when connecting victims to health care. Despite enthusiasm in pilot projects, evidence for efficacy compared to conventional IPV prevention approaches is limited. A major strength of mHealth IPV prevention programming is the ability to tailor interventions to individual victim needs without extensive human resource expenditure by providers.

AB - Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used across health programming including intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention to optimize screening, educational outreach, and linkages to care via telehealth. We systematically evaluated current web-based and mHealth interventions, which include web- or mobile-based delivery methods for primary, secondary, and tertiary IPV victimization prevention. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for empirical studies published 1998–2019. Studies were included if they considered empirical data, participants in adult romantic relationships, IPV as a primary or secondary outcome, and an mHealth component. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to record critical ratings of quality among studies selected for inclusion. We assessed variation in targeted populations, types of IPV addressed, and mHealth approaches used. Of 133 studies identified for full-text review, 31 were included. Computer-based screening with or without integrated education was the most common mHealth approach (n = 8, 26%), followed by safety decision aids (n = 7, 23%). Feasibility and acceptability were found to be generally high where assessed (23% of studies, n = 7). There was limited evidence around whether mHealth interventions better addressed population needs compared to conventional interventions. mHealth tools for IPV prevention are especially acceptable in health-care settings, on mobile phone platforms, or when connecting victims to health care. Despite enthusiasm in pilot projects, evidence for efficacy compared to conventional IPV prevention approaches is limited. A major strength of mHealth IPV prevention programming is the ability to tailor interventions to individual victim needs without extensive human resource expenditure by providers.

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - mHealth

KW - mobile health

KW - violence prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075376529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075376529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1524838019888889

DO - 10.1177/1524838019888889

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075376529

JO - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse

JF - Trauma, Violence, and Abuse

SN - 1524-8380

ER -