Weed management costs, weed best management practices, and the roundup ready® weed management program

Terry M. Hurley, Paul D. Mitchell, George B Frisvold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Roundup Ready® (RR) crops have been widely adopted because they provide significant benefits to growers, but glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten the sustainability of these benefits. Weed best-management practices (BMPs) help manage resistance, but could increase weed-control costs, limiting their adoption. We use survey results to explore how adoption of BMPs affects weed-management costs in corn, cotton, and soybeans, controlling for farmer and regional characteristics. More experienced growers had lower weed-control costs. Cleaning equipment, using herbicides with different modes of action, and using supplemental tillage are BMPs associated with increased costs for some crops, which may explain why they are less widely adopted than other BMPs. However, growers commonly use other weed BMPs that also increase costs. Regression results suggest adoption of RR crops reduces weed-control costs and that weed scouting reduces costs for cotton and soybean growers. Use of residual herbicides was associated with higher costs for cotton growers, but not for corn or soybean growers. Rotating RR and non-RR crops on the same acreage was associated with higher costs for soybeans, but not for corn or cotton growers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-290
Number of pages10
JournalAgBioForum
Volume12
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

glyphosate
best management practices
Practice Guidelines
weed control
growers
weeds
Costs and Cost Analysis
Weed Control
cotton
Soybeans
soybeans
Zea mays
crops
corn
Herbicides
cleaning equipment
herbicides
Cost management
Program management
Weeds

Keywords

  • Bmp adoption
  • Glyphosate
  • Herbicide
  • Resistance management
  • Telephone survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Food Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Biotechnology

Cite this

Weed management costs, weed best management practices, and the roundup ready® weed management program. / Hurley, Terry M.; Mitchell, Paul D.; Frisvold, George B.

In: AgBioForum, Vol. 12, No. 3-4, 2009, p. 281-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f0c49f2214c4e5385b3978efdcbcfe3,
title = "Weed management costs, weed best management practices, and the roundup ready{\circledR} weed management program",
abstract = "Roundup Ready{\circledR} (RR) crops have been widely adopted because they provide significant benefits to growers, but glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten the sustainability of these benefits. Weed best-management practices (BMPs) help manage resistance, but could increase weed-control costs, limiting their adoption. We use survey results to explore how adoption of BMPs affects weed-management costs in corn, cotton, and soybeans, controlling for farmer and regional characteristics. More experienced growers had lower weed-control costs. Cleaning equipment, using herbicides with different modes of action, and using supplemental tillage are BMPs associated with increased costs for some crops, which may explain why they are less widely adopted than other BMPs. However, growers commonly use other weed BMPs that also increase costs. Regression results suggest adoption of RR crops reduces weed-control costs and that weed scouting reduces costs for cotton and soybean growers. Use of residual herbicides was associated with higher costs for cotton growers, but not for corn or soybean growers. Rotating RR and non-RR crops on the same acreage was associated with higher costs for soybeans, but not for corn or cotton growers.",
keywords = "Bmp adoption, Glyphosate, Herbicide, Resistance management, Telephone survey",
author = "Hurley, {Terry M.} and Mitchell, {Paul D.} and Frisvold, {George B}",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "281--290",
journal = "AgBioForum",
issn = "1522-936X",
publisher = "University of Missouri",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weed management costs, weed best management practices, and the roundup ready® weed management program

AU - Hurley, Terry M.

AU - Mitchell, Paul D.

AU - Frisvold, George B

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Roundup Ready® (RR) crops have been widely adopted because they provide significant benefits to growers, but glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten the sustainability of these benefits. Weed best-management practices (BMPs) help manage resistance, but could increase weed-control costs, limiting their adoption. We use survey results to explore how adoption of BMPs affects weed-management costs in corn, cotton, and soybeans, controlling for farmer and regional characteristics. More experienced growers had lower weed-control costs. Cleaning equipment, using herbicides with different modes of action, and using supplemental tillage are BMPs associated with increased costs for some crops, which may explain why they are less widely adopted than other BMPs. However, growers commonly use other weed BMPs that also increase costs. Regression results suggest adoption of RR crops reduces weed-control costs and that weed scouting reduces costs for cotton and soybean growers. Use of residual herbicides was associated with higher costs for cotton growers, but not for corn or soybean growers. Rotating RR and non-RR crops on the same acreage was associated with higher costs for soybeans, but not for corn or cotton growers.

AB - Roundup Ready® (RR) crops have been widely adopted because they provide significant benefits to growers, but glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten the sustainability of these benefits. Weed best-management practices (BMPs) help manage resistance, but could increase weed-control costs, limiting their adoption. We use survey results to explore how adoption of BMPs affects weed-management costs in corn, cotton, and soybeans, controlling for farmer and regional characteristics. More experienced growers had lower weed-control costs. Cleaning equipment, using herbicides with different modes of action, and using supplemental tillage are BMPs associated with increased costs for some crops, which may explain why they are less widely adopted than other BMPs. However, growers commonly use other weed BMPs that also increase costs. Regression results suggest adoption of RR crops reduces weed-control costs and that weed scouting reduces costs for cotton and soybean growers. Use of residual herbicides was associated with higher costs for cotton growers, but not for corn or soybean growers. Rotating RR and non-RR crops on the same acreage was associated with higher costs for soybeans, but not for corn or cotton growers.

KW - Bmp adoption

KW - Glyphosate

KW - Herbicide

KW - Resistance management

KW - Telephone survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954375853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954375853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 281

EP - 290

JO - AgBioForum

JF - AgBioForum

SN - 1522-936X

IS - 3-4

ER -