Well, should they? A response to if people would be outraged by their rulings, should judges care?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

7 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	213-240
Number of pages	28
Journal	Stanford Law Review
Volume	60
Issue number	1
State	Published - Oct 1 2007
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Law

Access to Document

Cite this

Coan, A. B. (2007). Well, should they? A response to if people would be outraged by their rulings, should judges care? Stanford Law Review, 60(1), 213-240.

@article{496db14acea74993a38dec19fea30a2e,

title = "Well, should they? A response to if people would be outraged by their rulings, should judges care?",

author = "Coan, {Andrew B.}",

year = "2007",

month = oct,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "60",

pages = "213--240",

journal = "Stanford Law Review",

issn = "0038-9765",

publisher = "Stanford Law School",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Well, should they? A response to if people would be outraged by their rulings, should judges care?

AU - Coan, Andrew B.

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849009691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849009691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:37849009691

VL - 60

SP - 213

EP - 240

JO - Stanford Law Review

JF - Stanford Law Review

SN - 0038-9765

IS - 1

ER -