What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites

Stephen A Rains, Steven R. Brunner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The substantial growth in research examining social network sites (SNSs) during recent years makes this an opportune time to reflect on the state of SNS scholarship. In this review, we consider what—in the form of specific brands—has been studied. A content-analysis of SNS research published in six interdisciplinary journals between 1997 and 2013 is first reported to better understand the degree to which studies published in these journals have examined various SNS brands (e.g. Facebook, MySpace, Cyworld, Hyves). The results show that more than two-thirds of SNS studies were explicitly limited to a single brand and that Facebook was the brand examined in approximately 80% of these studies. Five implications of this trend are then discussed as potentially limiting what can be learned in aggregate from such a body of SNS scholarship. The review concludes with recommendations for future research on SNSs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-131
Number of pages18
JournalNew Media and Society
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 17 2015

Fingerprint

facebook
social network
content analysis
trend

Keywords

  • Communication and information technology
  • computer-mediated communication
  • social network sites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. / Rains, Stephen A; Brunner, Steven R.

In: New Media and Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 17.01.2015, p. 114-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90e2f77d98a9455fa9027004a0a37264,
title = "What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites",
abstract = "The substantial growth in research examining social network sites (SNSs) during recent years makes this an opportune time to reflect on the state of SNS scholarship. In this review, we consider what—in the form of specific brands—has been studied. A content-analysis of SNS research published in six interdisciplinary journals between 1997 and 2013 is first reported to better understand the degree to which studies published in these journals have examined various SNS brands (e.g. Facebook, MySpace, Cyworld, Hyves). The results show that more than two-thirds of SNS studies were explicitly limited to a single brand and that Facebook was the brand examined in approximately 80{\%} of these studies. Five implications of this trend are then discussed as potentially limiting what can be learned in aggregate from such a body of SNS scholarship. The review concludes with recommendations for future research on SNSs.",
keywords = "Communication and information technology, computer-mediated communication, social network sites",
author = "Rains, {Stephen A} and Brunner, {Steven R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1177/1461444814546481",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "114--131",
journal = "New Media and Society",
issn = "1461-4448",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites

AU - Rains, Stephen A

AU - Brunner, Steven R.

PY - 2015/1/17

Y1 - 2015/1/17

N2 - The substantial growth in research examining social network sites (SNSs) during recent years makes this an opportune time to reflect on the state of SNS scholarship. In this review, we consider what—in the form of specific brands—has been studied. A content-analysis of SNS research published in six interdisciplinary journals between 1997 and 2013 is first reported to better understand the degree to which studies published in these journals have examined various SNS brands (e.g. Facebook, MySpace, Cyworld, Hyves). The results show that more than two-thirds of SNS studies were explicitly limited to a single brand and that Facebook was the brand examined in approximately 80% of these studies. Five implications of this trend are then discussed as potentially limiting what can be learned in aggregate from such a body of SNS scholarship. The review concludes with recommendations for future research on SNSs.

AB - The substantial growth in research examining social network sites (SNSs) during recent years makes this an opportune time to reflect on the state of SNS scholarship. In this review, we consider what—in the form of specific brands—has been studied. A content-analysis of SNS research published in six interdisciplinary journals between 1997 and 2013 is first reported to better understand the degree to which studies published in these journals have examined various SNS brands (e.g. Facebook, MySpace, Cyworld, Hyves). The results show that more than two-thirds of SNS studies were explicitly limited to a single brand and that Facebook was the brand examined in approximately 80% of these studies. Five implications of this trend are then discussed as potentially limiting what can be learned in aggregate from such a body of SNS scholarship. The review concludes with recommendations for future research on SNSs.

KW - Communication and information technology

KW - computer-mediated communication

KW - social network sites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921275813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921275813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1461444814546481

DO - 10.1177/1461444814546481

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84921275813

VL - 17

SP - 114

EP - 131

JO - New Media and Society

JF - New Media and Society

SN - 1461-4448

IS - 1

ER -