What is disinformation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prototypical instances of disinformation include deceptive advertising (in business and in politics), government propaganda, doctored photographs, forged documents, fake maps, internet frauds, fake websites, and manipulated Wikipedia entries. Disinformation can cause significant harm if people are misled by it. In order to address this critical threat to information quality, we first need to understand exactly what disinformation is. This paper surveys the various analyses of this concept that have been proposed by information scientists and philosophers (most notably, Luciano Floridi). It argues that these analyses are either too broad (that is, that they include things that are not disinformation), or too narrow (they exclude things that are disinformation), or both. Indeed, several of these analyses exclude important forms of disinformation, such as true disinformation, visual disinformation, side-effect disinformation, and adaptive disinformation. After considering the shortcomings of these analyses, the paper argues that disinformation is misleading information that has the function of misleading. Finally, in addition to responding to Floridi’s claim that such a precise analysis of disinformation is not necessary, it briefly discusses how this analysis can help us develop techniques for detecting disinformation and policies for deterring its spread.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-426
Number of pages26
JournalLibrary Trends
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

disinformation
Wikipedia
propaganda

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

What is disinformation? / Fallis, Don T.

In: Library Trends, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2015, p. 401-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fallis, Don T. / What is disinformation?. In: Library Trends. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. 3. pp. 401-426.
@article{d52461c0e9d54c4793363573a2bfb7b9,
title = "What is disinformation?",
abstract = "Prototypical instances of disinformation include deceptive advertising (in business and in politics), government propaganda, doctored photographs, forged documents, fake maps, internet frauds, fake websites, and manipulated Wikipedia entries. Disinformation can cause significant harm if people are misled by it. In order to address this critical threat to information quality, we first need to understand exactly what disinformation is. This paper surveys the various analyses of this concept that have been proposed by information scientists and philosophers (most notably, Luciano Floridi). It argues that these analyses are either too broad (that is, that they include things that are not disinformation), or too narrow (they exclude things that are disinformation), or both. Indeed, several of these analyses exclude important forms of disinformation, such as true disinformation, visual disinformation, side-effect disinformation, and adaptive disinformation. After considering the shortcomings of these analyses, the paper argues that disinformation is misleading information that has the function of misleading. Finally, in addition to responding to Floridi’s claim that such a precise analysis of disinformation is not necessary, it briefly discusses how this analysis can help us develop techniques for detecting disinformation and policies for deterring its spread.",
author = "Fallis, {Don T}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1353/lib.2015.0014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "401--426",
journal = "Library Trends",
issn = "0024-2594",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is disinformation?

AU - Fallis, Don T

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Prototypical instances of disinformation include deceptive advertising (in business and in politics), government propaganda, doctored photographs, forged documents, fake maps, internet frauds, fake websites, and manipulated Wikipedia entries. Disinformation can cause significant harm if people are misled by it. In order to address this critical threat to information quality, we first need to understand exactly what disinformation is. This paper surveys the various analyses of this concept that have been proposed by information scientists and philosophers (most notably, Luciano Floridi). It argues that these analyses are either too broad (that is, that they include things that are not disinformation), or too narrow (they exclude things that are disinformation), or both. Indeed, several of these analyses exclude important forms of disinformation, such as true disinformation, visual disinformation, side-effect disinformation, and adaptive disinformation. After considering the shortcomings of these analyses, the paper argues that disinformation is misleading information that has the function of misleading. Finally, in addition to responding to Floridi’s claim that such a precise analysis of disinformation is not necessary, it briefly discusses how this analysis can help us develop techniques for detecting disinformation and policies for deterring its spread.

AB - Prototypical instances of disinformation include deceptive advertising (in business and in politics), government propaganda, doctored photographs, forged documents, fake maps, internet frauds, fake websites, and manipulated Wikipedia entries. Disinformation can cause significant harm if people are misled by it. In order to address this critical threat to information quality, we first need to understand exactly what disinformation is. This paper surveys the various analyses of this concept that have been proposed by information scientists and philosophers (most notably, Luciano Floridi). It argues that these analyses are either too broad (that is, that they include things that are not disinformation), or too narrow (they exclude things that are disinformation), or both. Indeed, several of these analyses exclude important forms of disinformation, such as true disinformation, visual disinformation, side-effect disinformation, and adaptive disinformation. After considering the shortcomings of these analyses, the paper argues that disinformation is misleading information that has the function of misleading. Finally, in addition to responding to Floridi’s claim that such a precise analysis of disinformation is not necessary, it briefly discusses how this analysis can help us develop techniques for detecting disinformation and policies for deterring its spread.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928009578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928009578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/lib.2015.0014

DO - 10.1353/lib.2015.0014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928009578

VL - 63

SP - 401

EP - 426

JO - Library Trends

JF - Library Trends

SN - 0024-2594

IS - 3

ER -