What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination

Nathan P Podsakoff, Trevor M. Spoelma, Nitya Chawla, Allison S. Gabriel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The attention paid to intraindividual phenomena in applied psychology has rapidly increased during the last two decades. However, the design characteristics of studies using daily experience sampling methods and the proportion of within-person variance in the measures employed in these studies vary substantially. This raises a critical question yet to be addressed: are differences in the proportion of variance attributable to withinversus between-person factors dependent on construct-, measure-, design-, and/or sample-related characteristics? A multilevel analysis based on 1,051,808 within-person observations reported in 222 intraindividual empirical studies indicated that decisions about what to study (construct type), how to study it (measurement and design characteristics), and from whom to obtain the data (sample characteristics) predicted the proportion of variance attributable to within-person factors. We conclude with implications and recommendations for those conducting and reviewing applied intraindividual research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)727-754
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Applied Psychology
Multilevel Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • Experience sampling methods
  • Intraclass correlation
  • Intraindividual
  • Positive and negative affect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination. / Podsakoff, Nathan P; Spoelma, Trevor M.; Chawla, Nitya; Gabriel, Allison S.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 104, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 727-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Podsakoff, Nathan P ; Spoelma, Trevor M. ; Chawla, Nitya ; Gabriel, Allison S. / What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 104, No. 6. pp. 727-754.
@article{bf49172aec16473d890765f185268245,
title = "What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination",
abstract = "The attention paid to intraindividual phenomena in applied psychology has rapidly increased during the last two decades. However, the design characteristics of studies using daily experience sampling methods and the proportion of within-person variance in the measures employed in these studies vary substantially. This raises a critical question yet to be addressed: are differences in the proportion of variance attributable to withinversus between-person factors dependent on construct-, measure-, design-, and/or sample-related characteristics? A multilevel analysis based on 1,051,808 within-person observations reported in 222 intraindividual empirical studies indicated that decisions about what to study (construct type), how to study it (measurement and design characteristics), and from whom to obtain the data (sample characteristics) predicted the proportion of variance attributable to within-person factors. We conclude with implications and recommendations for those conducting and reviewing applied intraindividual research.",
keywords = "Experience sampling methods, Intraclass correlation, Intraindividual, Positive and negative affect",
author = "Podsakoff, {Nathan P} and Spoelma, {Trevor M.} and Nitya Chawla and Gabriel, {Allison S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/apl0000374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "727--754",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What predicts within-person variance in applied psychology constructs? An empirical examination

AU - Podsakoff, Nathan P

AU - Spoelma, Trevor M.

AU - Chawla, Nitya

AU - Gabriel, Allison S.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - The attention paid to intraindividual phenomena in applied psychology has rapidly increased during the last two decades. However, the design characteristics of studies using daily experience sampling methods and the proportion of within-person variance in the measures employed in these studies vary substantially. This raises a critical question yet to be addressed: are differences in the proportion of variance attributable to withinversus between-person factors dependent on construct-, measure-, design-, and/or sample-related characteristics? A multilevel analysis based on 1,051,808 within-person observations reported in 222 intraindividual empirical studies indicated that decisions about what to study (construct type), how to study it (measurement and design characteristics), and from whom to obtain the data (sample characteristics) predicted the proportion of variance attributable to within-person factors. We conclude with implications and recommendations for those conducting and reviewing applied intraindividual research.

AB - The attention paid to intraindividual phenomena in applied psychology has rapidly increased during the last two decades. However, the design characteristics of studies using daily experience sampling methods and the proportion of within-person variance in the measures employed in these studies vary substantially. This raises a critical question yet to be addressed: are differences in the proportion of variance attributable to withinversus between-person factors dependent on construct-, measure-, design-, and/or sample-related characteristics? A multilevel analysis based on 1,051,808 within-person observations reported in 222 intraindividual empirical studies indicated that decisions about what to study (construct type), how to study it (measurement and design characteristics), and from whom to obtain the data (sample characteristics) predicted the proportion of variance attributable to within-person factors. We conclude with implications and recommendations for those conducting and reviewing applied intraindividual research.

KW - Experience sampling methods

KW - Intraclass correlation

KW - Intraindividual

KW - Positive and negative affect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065966242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065966242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/apl0000374

DO - 10.1037/apl0000374

M3 - Article

C2 - 30640492

AN - SCOPUS:85065966242

VL - 104

SP - 727

EP - 754

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -