When a whole practice model is the intervention: Developing fidelity evaluation components using program theory-driven science for an integrative medicine primary care clinic

Sally E Dodds, Patricia M. Herman, Lee Sechrest, Ivo L Abraham, Melanie D. Logue, Amy J Jones-Grizzle, Rick A. Rehfeld, Terry F Urbine, Randy J Horwitz, Robert L. Crocker, Victoria Maizes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Integrative medicine (IM) is a clinical paradigm of whole person healthcare that combines appropriate conventional and complementary medicine (CM) treatments. Studies of integrative healthcare systems and theory-driven evaluations of IM practice models need to be undertaken. Two health services research methods can strengthen the validity of IM healthcare studies, practice theory, and fidelity evaluation. The University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) is a membership-supported integrative primary care clinic in Phoenix, AZ. A comparative effectiveness evaluation is being conducted to assess its clinical and cost outcomes. A process evaluation of the clinic's practice theory components assesses model fidelity for four purposes: (1) as a measure of intervention integrity to determine whether the practice model was delivered as intended; (2) to describe an integrative primary care clinic model as it is being developed and refined; (3) as potential covariates in the outcomes analyses, to assist in interpretation of findings, and for external validity and replication; and (4) to provide feedback for needed corrections and improvements of clinic operations over time. This paper provides a rationale for the use of practice theory and fidelity evaluation in studies of integrative practices and describes the approach and protocol used in fidelity evaluation of the UAIHC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number652047
JournalEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume2013
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Integrative Medicine
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Health Services Research
Health
Complementary Therapies
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

@article{3371d78a8a1444269549924ddc991f78,
title = "When a whole practice model is the intervention: Developing fidelity evaluation components using program theory-driven science for an integrative medicine primary care clinic",
abstract = "Integrative medicine (IM) is a clinical paradigm of whole person healthcare that combines appropriate conventional and complementary medicine (CM) treatments. Studies of integrative healthcare systems and theory-driven evaluations of IM practice models need to be undertaken. Two health services research methods can strengthen the validity of IM healthcare studies, practice theory, and fidelity evaluation. The University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) is a membership-supported integrative primary care clinic in Phoenix, AZ. A comparative effectiveness evaluation is being conducted to assess its clinical and cost outcomes. A process evaluation of the clinic's practice theory components assesses model fidelity for four purposes: (1) as a measure of intervention integrity to determine whether the practice model was delivered as intended; (2) to describe an integrative primary care clinic model as it is being developed and refined; (3) as potential covariates in the outcomes analyses, to assist in interpretation of findings, and for external validity and replication; and (4) to provide feedback for needed corrections and improvements of clinic operations over time. This paper provides a rationale for the use of practice theory and fidelity evaluation in studies of integrative practices and describes the approach and protocol used in fidelity evaluation of the UAIHC.",
author = "Dodds, {Sally E} and Herman, {Patricia M.} and Lee Sechrest and Abraham, {Ivo L} and Logue, {Melanie D.} and Jones-Grizzle, {Amy J} and Rehfeld, {Rick A.} and Urbine, {Terry F} and Horwitz, {Randy J} and Crocker, {Robert L.} and Victoria Maizes",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1155/2013/652047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2013",
journal = "Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
issn = "1741-427X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When a whole practice model is the intervention

T2 - Developing fidelity evaluation components using program theory-driven science for an integrative medicine primary care clinic

AU - Dodds, Sally E

AU - Herman, Patricia M.

AU - Sechrest, Lee

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

AU - Logue, Melanie D.

AU - Jones-Grizzle, Amy J

AU - Rehfeld, Rick A.

AU - Urbine, Terry F

AU - Horwitz, Randy J

AU - Crocker, Robert L.

AU - Maizes, Victoria

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Integrative medicine (IM) is a clinical paradigm of whole person healthcare that combines appropriate conventional and complementary medicine (CM) treatments. Studies of integrative healthcare systems and theory-driven evaluations of IM practice models need to be undertaken. Two health services research methods can strengthen the validity of IM healthcare studies, practice theory, and fidelity evaluation. The University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) is a membership-supported integrative primary care clinic in Phoenix, AZ. A comparative effectiveness evaluation is being conducted to assess its clinical and cost outcomes. A process evaluation of the clinic's practice theory components assesses model fidelity for four purposes: (1) as a measure of intervention integrity to determine whether the practice model was delivered as intended; (2) to describe an integrative primary care clinic model as it is being developed and refined; (3) as potential covariates in the outcomes analyses, to assist in interpretation of findings, and for external validity and replication; and (4) to provide feedback for needed corrections and improvements of clinic operations over time. This paper provides a rationale for the use of practice theory and fidelity evaluation in studies of integrative practices and describes the approach and protocol used in fidelity evaluation of the UAIHC.

AB - Integrative medicine (IM) is a clinical paradigm of whole person healthcare that combines appropriate conventional and complementary medicine (CM) treatments. Studies of integrative healthcare systems and theory-driven evaluations of IM practice models need to be undertaken. Two health services research methods can strengthen the validity of IM healthcare studies, practice theory, and fidelity evaluation. The University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) is a membership-supported integrative primary care clinic in Phoenix, AZ. A comparative effectiveness evaluation is being conducted to assess its clinical and cost outcomes. A process evaluation of the clinic's practice theory components assesses model fidelity for four purposes: (1) as a measure of intervention integrity to determine whether the practice model was delivered as intended; (2) to describe an integrative primary care clinic model as it is being developed and refined; (3) as potential covariates in the outcomes analyses, to assist in interpretation of findings, and for external validity and replication; and (4) to provide feedback for needed corrections and improvements of clinic operations over time. This paper provides a rationale for the use of practice theory and fidelity evaluation in studies of integrative practices and describes the approach and protocol used in fidelity evaluation of the UAIHC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893772747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893772747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2013/652047

DO - 10.1155/2013/652047

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893772747

VL - 2013

JO - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

SN - 1741-427X

M1 - 652047

ER -