When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that troubles - including how they are identified, how responsibilities for their creation and remedy are assigned, and the actions people pursue to resolve them - are a central sociological concern that runs across a wide array of sub-fields. This article illustrates this point by examining how troubles are discussed in literatures including the sociology of law (or, more broadly, law and society), social movement studies, social problems, and organizational quality and conflict. Furthermore, this article argues that more is being lost by parceling these questions into disconnected sub-fields chosen based on the resolution process (i.e., use a court to resolve the problem, use a social movement, use policy-making) than is being intellectually gained. To make this point, common findings, questions, and quandaries that emerge from a broader examination of a sociology of troubles are discussed. The article recommends that a broader sociology of troubles be developed, bringing the welter of sub-?elds studying troubles into smoother conversation, and recommends analyses that consider multiple resolution alternatives (e.g., ?ling a lawsuit, versus protesting, versus "lumping it").

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSociology of Crime Law and Deviance
Pages231-254
Number of pages24
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameSociology of Crime Law and Deviance
Volume12
ISSN (Print)15216136

Fingerprint

social movement
sociology
sociology of law
lawsuit
Social Problems
remedies
conversation
responsibility
examination
Law
Society
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Earl, J. S. (2009). When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles. In Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance (Vol. 12, pp. 231-254). (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance; Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013

When bad things happen : Toward a sociology of troubles. / Earl, Jennifer Suzanne.

Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance. Vol. 12 2009. p. 231-254 (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance; Vol. 12).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Earl, JS 2009, When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles. in Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance. vol. 12, Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, vol. 12, pp. 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013
Earl JS. When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles. In Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance. Vol. 12. 2009. p. 231-254. (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013
Earl, Jennifer Suzanne. / When bad things happen : Toward a sociology of troubles. Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance. Vol. 12 2009. pp. 231-254 (Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance).
@inbook{51ee4142422c440389108b39f52591b2,
title = "When bad things happen: Toward a sociology of troubles",
abstract = "This article argues that troubles - including how they are identified, how responsibilities for their creation and remedy are assigned, and the actions people pursue to resolve them - are a central sociological concern that runs across a wide array of sub-fields. This article illustrates this point by examining how troubles are discussed in literatures including the sociology of law (or, more broadly, law and society), social movement studies, social problems, and organizational quality and conflict. Furthermore, this article argues that more is being lost by parceling these questions into disconnected sub-fields chosen based on the resolution process (i.e., use a court to resolve the problem, use a social movement, use policy-making) than is being intellectually gained. To make this point, common findings, questions, and quandaries that emerge from a broader examination of a sociology of troubles are discussed. The article recommends that a broader sociology of troubles be developed, bringing the welter of sub-?elds studying troubles into smoother conversation, and recommends analyses that consider multiple resolution alternatives (e.g., ?ling a lawsuit, versus protesting, versus {"}lumping it{"}).",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781848552425",
volume = "12",
series = "Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance",
pages = "231--254",
booktitle = "Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - When bad things happen

T2 - Toward a sociology of troubles

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article argues that troubles - including how they are identified, how responsibilities for their creation and remedy are assigned, and the actions people pursue to resolve them - are a central sociological concern that runs across a wide array of sub-fields. This article illustrates this point by examining how troubles are discussed in literatures including the sociology of law (or, more broadly, law and society), social movement studies, social problems, and organizational quality and conflict. Furthermore, this article argues that more is being lost by parceling these questions into disconnected sub-fields chosen based on the resolution process (i.e., use a court to resolve the problem, use a social movement, use policy-making) than is being intellectually gained. To make this point, common findings, questions, and quandaries that emerge from a broader examination of a sociology of troubles are discussed. The article recommends that a broader sociology of troubles be developed, bringing the welter of sub-?elds studying troubles into smoother conversation, and recommends analyses that consider multiple resolution alternatives (e.g., ?ling a lawsuit, versus protesting, versus "lumping it").

AB - This article argues that troubles - including how they are identified, how responsibilities for their creation and remedy are assigned, and the actions people pursue to resolve them - are a central sociological concern that runs across a wide array of sub-fields. This article illustrates this point by examining how troubles are discussed in literatures including the sociology of law (or, more broadly, law and society), social movement studies, social problems, and organizational quality and conflict. Furthermore, this article argues that more is being lost by parceling these questions into disconnected sub-fields chosen based on the resolution process (i.e., use a court to resolve the problem, use a social movement, use policy-making) than is being intellectually gained. To make this point, common findings, questions, and quandaries that emerge from a broader examination of a sociology of troubles are discussed. The article recommends that a broader sociology of troubles be developed, bringing the welter of sub-?elds studying troubles into smoother conversation, and recommends analyses that consider multiple resolution alternatives (e.g., ?ling a lawsuit, versus protesting, versus "lumping it").

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950717542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950717542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013

DO - 10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012013

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:77950717542

SN - 9781848552425

VL - 12

T3 - Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance

SP - 231

EP - 254

BT - Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance

ER -