When Exemplification Fails: Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity

Jeffrey A Stone, Joel Cooper, Andrew W. Wiegand, Elliot Aronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

166 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available: a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-65
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume72
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

integrity
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

When Exemplification Fails : Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity. / Stone, Jeffrey A; Cooper, Joel; Wiegand, Andrew W.; Aronson, Elliot.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 54-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stone, Jeffrey A ; Cooper, Joel ; Wiegand, Andrew W. ; Aronson, Elliot. / When Exemplification Fails : Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 54-65.
@article{7a14f5e1eed7490e8a98be691646ec00,
title = "When Exemplification Fails: Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available: a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.",
author = "Stone, {Jeffrey A} and Joel Cooper and Wiegand, {Andrew W.} and Elliot Aronson",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "54--65",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Exemplification Fails

T2 - Hypocrisy and the Motive for Self-Integrity

AU - Stone, Jeffrey A

AU - Cooper, Joel

AU - Wiegand, Andrew W.

AU - Aronson, Elliot

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available: a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.

AB - Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available: a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031287954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031287954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9008374

AN - SCOPUS:0031287954

VL - 72

SP - 54

EP - 65

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -