When Internationalization Funding Feels Tight: Satisfaction With Funding and Campus Internationalization Strategies

Chris R. Glass, Jenny J Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated predictors of satisfaction with an institution’s strategy for campus internationalization among international affairs staff (N = 1,520) and compared the varying perceptions of their institution’s funding to fulfill this mandate. This study identified factors that influenced these individuals’ sense of their institution’s internationalization strategy. Among international affairs staff who were most dissatisfied with their institution’s funding, satisfaction with how their institution managed the outsourcing of university functions, and perceived competition with other universities most influenced their perceptions of strategy. For those moderately satisfied with funding, retention of senior university leadership most influenced their perceptions of strategy. Support from senior administration, communication with faculty, and capacity to support increased student enrollment influenced perceptions of strategy for all respondents. The results of this study suggest the negotiation of the educational and entrepreneurial rationales for internationalization are far more complex—and dependent on far more factors—at institutions where international affairs staff perceive fewer human and financial resources to be available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Studies in International Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

internationalization
funding
staff
university
outsourcing
leadership
communication
resources
student

Keywords

  • comprehensive internationalization
  • globalization and international higher education
  • internationalization of higher education
  • strategic institutional management of internationalization
  • university staff satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{1a9bff541552471187bc524bb9324dba,
title = "When Internationalization Funding Feels Tight: Satisfaction With Funding and Campus Internationalization Strategies",
abstract = "This study investigated predictors of satisfaction with an institution’s strategy for campus internationalization among international affairs staff (N = 1,520) and compared the varying perceptions of their institution’s funding to fulfill this mandate. This study identified factors that influenced these individuals’ sense of their institution’s internationalization strategy. Among international affairs staff who were most dissatisfied with their institution’s funding, satisfaction with how their institution managed the outsourcing of university functions, and perceived competition with other universities most influenced their perceptions of strategy. For those moderately satisfied with funding, retention of senior university leadership most influenced their perceptions of strategy. Support from senior administration, communication with faculty, and capacity to support increased student enrollment influenced perceptions of strategy for all respondents. The results of this study suggest the negotiation of the educational and entrepreneurial rationales for internationalization are far more complex—and dependent on far more factors—at institutions where international affairs staff perceive fewer human and financial resources to be available.",
keywords = "comprehensive internationalization, globalization and international higher education, internationalization of higher education, strategic institutional management of internationalization, university staff satisfaction",
author = "Glass, {Chris R.} and Lee, {Jenny J}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1028315318773146",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Studies in International Education",
issn = "1028-3153",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Internationalization Funding Feels Tight

T2 - Satisfaction With Funding and Campus Internationalization Strategies

AU - Glass, Chris R.

AU - Lee, Jenny J

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - This study investigated predictors of satisfaction with an institution’s strategy for campus internationalization among international affairs staff (N = 1,520) and compared the varying perceptions of their institution’s funding to fulfill this mandate. This study identified factors that influenced these individuals’ sense of their institution’s internationalization strategy. Among international affairs staff who were most dissatisfied with their institution’s funding, satisfaction with how their institution managed the outsourcing of university functions, and perceived competition with other universities most influenced their perceptions of strategy. For those moderately satisfied with funding, retention of senior university leadership most influenced their perceptions of strategy. Support from senior administration, communication with faculty, and capacity to support increased student enrollment influenced perceptions of strategy for all respondents. The results of this study suggest the negotiation of the educational and entrepreneurial rationales for internationalization are far more complex—and dependent on far more factors—at institutions where international affairs staff perceive fewer human and financial resources to be available.

AB - This study investigated predictors of satisfaction with an institution’s strategy for campus internationalization among international affairs staff (N = 1,520) and compared the varying perceptions of their institution’s funding to fulfill this mandate. This study identified factors that influenced these individuals’ sense of their institution’s internationalization strategy. Among international affairs staff who were most dissatisfied with their institution’s funding, satisfaction with how their institution managed the outsourcing of university functions, and perceived competition with other universities most influenced their perceptions of strategy. For those moderately satisfied with funding, retention of senior university leadership most influenced their perceptions of strategy. Support from senior administration, communication with faculty, and capacity to support increased student enrollment influenced perceptions of strategy for all respondents. The results of this study suggest the negotiation of the educational and entrepreneurial rationales for internationalization are far more complex—and dependent on far more factors—at institutions where international affairs staff perceive fewer human and financial resources to be available.

KW - comprehensive internationalization

KW - globalization and international higher education

KW - internationalization of higher education

KW - strategic institutional management of internationalization

KW - university staff satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046734328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046734328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1028315318773146

DO - 10.1177/1028315318773146

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046734328

JO - Journal of Studies in International Education

JF - Journal of Studies in International Education

SN - 1028-3153

ER -