White flowers finish last: pollen-foraging bumble bees show biased learning in a floral color polymorphism

Avery L. Russell, China Rae Newman, Daniel R Papaj

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pollinator-driven selection is thought to drive much of the extraordinary diversity of flowering plants. Plants that produce floral traits preferred by particular pollinators are more likely to receive conspecific pollen and to evolve further adaptations to those pollinators that enhance pollination and ultimately generate floral diversity. Two mechanisms in particular, sensory bias and learning, are thought to explain how pollinator preference can contribute to divergence and speciation in flowering plants. While the preferences of pollinators, such as bees, flies, and birds, are frequently implicated in patterns of floral trait evolution, the role of learning in generating reproductive isolation and trait divergence for different floral types within plant populations is not well understood. Floral color polymorphism in particular provides an excellent opportunity to examine how pollinator behavior and learning might maintain the different floral morphs. In this study we asked if bumble bees showed innate preferences for different color morphs of the pollen-only plant Solanum tridynamum, whether bees formed preferences for the morphs with which they had experience collecting pollen from, and the strength of those learned preferences. Using an absolute conditioning protocol, we gave bees experience collecting pollen from a color polymorphic plant species that offered only pollen rewards. Despite initially-naïve bees showing no apparent innate bias toward human-white versus human-purple flower morphs, we did find evidence of a bias in learning. Specifically, bees learned strong preferences for purple corollas, but learned only weak preferences for hypochromic (human-white) corollas. We discuss how our results might explain patterns of floral display evolution, particularly as they relate to color polymorphisms. Additionally, we propose that the ease with which floral visual traits are learned—i.e., biases in learning—can influence the evolution of floral color as a signal to pollinators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-191
Number of pages19
JournalEvolutionary Ecology
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Bombus
pollinating insects
pollinator
bee
flower
polymorphism
pollen
learning
genetic polymorphism
foraging
flowers
morphs
color
Apoidea
floral trait
angiosperm
Angiospermae
divergence
Bombyliidae
reproductive isolation

Keywords

  • Biases in learning
  • Bumble bee
  • Color polymorphism
  • Learning
  • Pollen reward
  • Preference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

White flowers finish last : pollen-foraging bumble bees show biased learning in a floral color polymorphism. / Russell, Avery L.; Newman, China Rae; Papaj, Daniel R.

In: Evolutionary Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 173-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b798f5dc7bc04ccf85009bce79c7acae,
title = "White flowers finish last: pollen-foraging bumble bees show biased learning in a floral color polymorphism",
abstract = "Pollinator-driven selection is thought to drive much of the extraordinary diversity of flowering plants. Plants that produce floral traits preferred by particular pollinators are more likely to receive conspecific pollen and to evolve further adaptations to those pollinators that enhance pollination and ultimately generate floral diversity. Two mechanisms in particular, sensory bias and learning, are thought to explain how pollinator preference can contribute to divergence and speciation in flowering plants. While the preferences of pollinators, such as bees, flies, and birds, are frequently implicated in patterns of floral trait evolution, the role of learning in generating reproductive isolation and trait divergence for different floral types within plant populations is not well understood. Floral color polymorphism in particular provides an excellent opportunity to examine how pollinator behavior and learning might maintain the different floral morphs. In this study we asked if bumble bees showed innate preferences for different color morphs of the pollen-only plant Solanum tridynamum, whether bees formed preferences for the morphs with which they had experience collecting pollen from, and the strength of those learned preferences. Using an absolute conditioning protocol, we gave bees experience collecting pollen from a color polymorphic plant species that offered only pollen rewards. Despite initially-na{\"i}ve bees showing no apparent innate bias toward human-white versus human-purple flower morphs, we did find evidence of a bias in learning. Specifically, bees learned strong preferences for purple corollas, but learned only weak preferences for hypochromic (human-white) corollas. We discuss how our results might explain patterns of floral display evolution, particularly as they relate to color polymorphisms. Additionally, we propose that the ease with which floral visual traits are learned—i.e., biases in learning—can influence the evolution of floral color as a signal to pollinators.",
keywords = "Biases in learning, Bumble bee, Color polymorphism, Learning, Pollen reward, Preference",
author = "Russell, {Avery L.} and Newman, {China Rae} and Papaj, {Daniel R}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10682-016-9848-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "173--191",
journal = "Evolutionary Ecology",
issn = "0269-7653",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - White flowers finish last

T2 - pollen-foraging bumble bees show biased learning in a floral color polymorphism

AU - Russell, Avery L.

AU - Newman, China Rae

AU - Papaj, Daniel R

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Pollinator-driven selection is thought to drive much of the extraordinary diversity of flowering plants. Plants that produce floral traits preferred by particular pollinators are more likely to receive conspecific pollen and to evolve further adaptations to those pollinators that enhance pollination and ultimately generate floral diversity. Two mechanisms in particular, sensory bias and learning, are thought to explain how pollinator preference can contribute to divergence and speciation in flowering plants. While the preferences of pollinators, such as bees, flies, and birds, are frequently implicated in patterns of floral trait evolution, the role of learning in generating reproductive isolation and trait divergence for different floral types within plant populations is not well understood. Floral color polymorphism in particular provides an excellent opportunity to examine how pollinator behavior and learning might maintain the different floral morphs. In this study we asked if bumble bees showed innate preferences for different color morphs of the pollen-only plant Solanum tridynamum, whether bees formed preferences for the morphs with which they had experience collecting pollen from, and the strength of those learned preferences. Using an absolute conditioning protocol, we gave bees experience collecting pollen from a color polymorphic plant species that offered only pollen rewards. Despite initially-naïve bees showing no apparent innate bias toward human-white versus human-purple flower morphs, we did find evidence of a bias in learning. Specifically, bees learned strong preferences for purple corollas, but learned only weak preferences for hypochromic (human-white) corollas. We discuss how our results might explain patterns of floral display evolution, particularly as they relate to color polymorphisms. Additionally, we propose that the ease with which floral visual traits are learned—i.e., biases in learning—can influence the evolution of floral color as a signal to pollinators.

AB - Pollinator-driven selection is thought to drive much of the extraordinary diversity of flowering plants. Plants that produce floral traits preferred by particular pollinators are more likely to receive conspecific pollen and to evolve further adaptations to those pollinators that enhance pollination and ultimately generate floral diversity. Two mechanisms in particular, sensory bias and learning, are thought to explain how pollinator preference can contribute to divergence and speciation in flowering plants. While the preferences of pollinators, such as bees, flies, and birds, are frequently implicated in patterns of floral trait evolution, the role of learning in generating reproductive isolation and trait divergence for different floral types within plant populations is not well understood. Floral color polymorphism in particular provides an excellent opportunity to examine how pollinator behavior and learning might maintain the different floral morphs. In this study we asked if bumble bees showed innate preferences for different color morphs of the pollen-only plant Solanum tridynamum, whether bees formed preferences for the morphs with which they had experience collecting pollen from, and the strength of those learned preferences. Using an absolute conditioning protocol, we gave bees experience collecting pollen from a color polymorphic plant species that offered only pollen rewards. Despite initially-naïve bees showing no apparent innate bias toward human-white versus human-purple flower morphs, we did find evidence of a bias in learning. Specifically, bees learned strong preferences for purple corollas, but learned only weak preferences for hypochromic (human-white) corollas. We discuss how our results might explain patterns of floral display evolution, particularly as they relate to color polymorphisms. Additionally, we propose that the ease with which floral visual traits are learned—i.e., biases in learning—can influence the evolution of floral color as a signal to pollinators.

KW - Biases in learning

KW - Bumble bee

KW - Color polymorphism

KW - Learning

KW - Pollen reward

KW - Preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981516915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981516915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10682-016-9848-1

DO - 10.1007/s10682-016-9848-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981516915

VL - 31

SP - 173

EP - 191

JO - Evolutionary Ecology

JF - Evolutionary Ecology

SN - 0269-7653

IS - 2

ER -