Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American-European Comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-63
Number of pages23
JournalContemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis
Volume88
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Environmental regulation
Consumer protection
Tobacco control
GM crops
Smoking
Cigarettes
Factors
Genetically modified crops
Private sector
Institutional development
Health and safety
Cultural factors
Genetically modified organisms
Divergence
Decision maker
European Union
Genetically modified food
Institutional factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{79b580c25f98459eac7a6a9e2f0a558d,
title = "Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American-European Comparison",
abstract = "This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.",
author = "Paulette Kurzer",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/S1569-3759(06)88003-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "41--63",
journal = "Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis",
issn = "1569-3759",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Steers the Field of Consumer Protection and Environmental Regulations? An American-European Comparison

AU - Kurzer, Paulette

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.

AB - This chapter examines whether the European Union or the United States set the parameters in the field of consumer protection and environmental regulations. The analysis points out that there is no straightforward answer because leadership rotates or fluctuates depending on the extent to which societies and decision makers feel strongly about a particular issue. Examples are tobacco control and regulations with regards to genetically modified crops and food. The US identified the risks related to the wide availability of cigarettes before the EU, while the EU highlighted the risks related to the introduction of GM crops/products in the absence of similar American concerns. Both cultural and institutional developments account for this divergence. A unique combination of factors heightened the salience of anti-smoking measures in the US, while an equally distinctive matrix of developments highlighted the social, economic, health, and safety challenges of genetically modified organism (GMO). However, in spite of different constellations of institutional and cultural factors, the EU has embraced tobacco control and the American private sector is slightly more cautious about pushing GM crops onto the market.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745169693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745169693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1569-3759(06)88003-4

DO - 10.1016/S1569-3759(06)88003-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33745169693

VL - 88

SP - 41

EP - 63

JO - Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis

JF - Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis

SN - 1569-3759

ER -