Why American Sign Language gloss must matter

Samuel J Supalla, Jody H. Cripps, Andrew P J Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RESPONDING TO AN ARTICLE by Grushkin on how deaf children best learn to read, published, along with the present article, in an American Annals of the Deaf special issue, the authors review American Sign Language gloss. Topics include how ASL gloss enables deaf children to learn to read in their own language and simultaneously experience a transition to written English, and what gloss looks like and how it underlines deaf children’s learning and mastery of English literacy through ASL. Rebuttal of Grushkin’s argument includes data describing a deaf child’s engagement in reading aloud (entirely in ASL) with a gloss text, which occurred without the breakdown implied by Grushkin. The authors characterize Grushkin’s argument that deaf children need to learn to read through a conventional ASL writing system as limiting, asserting that ASL gloss contributes more by providing a path for learning and mastering English literacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-551
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Annals of the Deaf
Volume161
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Sign Language
gloss
language
Learning
literacy
Reading
Language
learning
experience
Literacy

Keywords

  • ASL gloss
  • ASL-to-written-English transition
  • Best reading instruction practices
  • Oral reading in ASL
  • Signed language reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Why American Sign Language gloss must matter. / Supalla, Samuel J; Cripps, Jody H.; Byrne, Andrew P J.

In: American Annals of the Deaf, Vol. 161, No. 5, 01.12.2017, p. 540-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Supalla, Samuel J ; Cripps, Jody H. ; Byrne, Andrew P J. / Why American Sign Language gloss must matter. In: American Annals of the Deaf. 2017 ; Vol. 161, No. 5. pp. 540-551.
@article{f4de635a353544888b0208add02d9322,
title = "Why American Sign Language gloss must matter",
abstract = "RESPONDING TO AN ARTICLE by Grushkin on how deaf children best learn to read, published, along with the present article, in an American Annals of the Deaf special issue, the authors review American Sign Language gloss. Topics include how ASL gloss enables deaf children to learn to read in their own language and simultaneously experience a transition to written English, and what gloss looks like and how it underlines deaf children’s learning and mastery of English literacy through ASL. Rebuttal of Grushkin’s argument includes data describing a deaf child’s engagement in reading aloud (entirely in ASL) with a gloss text, which occurred without the breakdown implied by Grushkin. The authors characterize Grushkin’s argument that deaf children need to learn to read through a conventional ASL writing system as limiting, asserting that ASL gloss contributes more by providing a path for learning and mastering English literacy.",
keywords = "ASL gloss, ASL-to-written-English transition, Best reading instruction practices, Oral reading in ASL, Signed language reading",
author = "Supalla, {Samuel J} and Cripps, {Jody H.} and Byrne, {Andrew P J}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/aad.2017.0004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "540--551",
journal = "American Annals of the Deaf",
issn = "0002-726X",
publisher = "Gallaudet University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why American Sign Language gloss must matter

AU - Supalla, Samuel J

AU - Cripps, Jody H.

AU - Byrne, Andrew P J

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - RESPONDING TO AN ARTICLE by Grushkin on how deaf children best learn to read, published, along with the present article, in an American Annals of the Deaf special issue, the authors review American Sign Language gloss. Topics include how ASL gloss enables deaf children to learn to read in their own language and simultaneously experience a transition to written English, and what gloss looks like and how it underlines deaf children’s learning and mastery of English literacy through ASL. Rebuttal of Grushkin’s argument includes data describing a deaf child’s engagement in reading aloud (entirely in ASL) with a gloss text, which occurred without the breakdown implied by Grushkin. The authors characterize Grushkin’s argument that deaf children need to learn to read through a conventional ASL writing system as limiting, asserting that ASL gloss contributes more by providing a path for learning and mastering English literacy.

AB - RESPONDING TO AN ARTICLE by Grushkin on how deaf children best learn to read, published, along with the present article, in an American Annals of the Deaf special issue, the authors review American Sign Language gloss. Topics include how ASL gloss enables deaf children to learn to read in their own language and simultaneously experience a transition to written English, and what gloss looks like and how it underlines deaf children’s learning and mastery of English literacy through ASL. Rebuttal of Grushkin’s argument includes data describing a deaf child’s engagement in reading aloud (entirely in ASL) with a gloss text, which occurred without the breakdown implied by Grushkin. The authors characterize Grushkin’s argument that deaf children need to learn to read through a conventional ASL writing system as limiting, asserting that ASL gloss contributes more by providing a path for learning and mastering English literacy.

KW - ASL gloss

KW - ASL-to-written-English transition

KW - Best reading instruction practices

KW - Oral reading in ASL

KW - Signed language reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013646721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013646721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/aad.2017.0004

DO - 10.1353/aad.2017.0004

M3 - Article

VL - 161

SP - 540

EP - 551

JO - American Annals of the Deaf

JF - American Annals of the Deaf

SN - 0002-726X

IS - 5

ER -