Why intuitions and metaphysics are the wrong approach for health law: A commentary on Delaney and Hershenov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-19
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Legislation
Metaphysics
Moral Obligations
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Ethical Analysis
Intuition
Personal Autonomy
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Organ Transplantation
Informed Consent
Human Body
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

@article{0bbffdf87a184eb2898f67c7847a25ce,
title = "Why intuitions and metaphysics are the wrong approach for health law: A commentary on Delaney and Hershenov",
author = "Robertson, {Christopher T}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/15265160902939941",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "18--19",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why intuitions and metaphysics are the wrong approach for health law

T2 - A commentary on Delaney and Hershenov

AU - Robertson, Christopher T

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449574495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449574495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15265160902939941

DO - 10.1080/15265160902939941

M3 - Article

C2 - 19998151

AN - SCOPUS:70449574495

VL - 9

SP - 18

EP - 19

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 8

ER -