Witness to hypocrisy

Reacting to ingroup hypocrites in the presence of others

Amber M. Gaffney, Michael A. Hogg, Joel Cooper, Jeffrey A Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How is one's reaction to a fellow ingroup member's normative hypocrisy affected by the presence of a third party observer who is an ingroup member or an outgroup member? To investigate this question we experimentally manipulated the group membership and reaction of a third party to ingroup hypocrisy in a 2 × 2 design (N = 78) and measured participants' personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors that were normative of the ingroup. As predicted from a social identity analysis of the function of norms and prototypes in social influence processes, personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors was strongest when an outgroup member remarked negatively on the hypocrisy, and weakest when an outgroup member did not appear to notice the hypocrisy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-112
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Influence
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Social Identification

Keywords

  • Deviance
  • Group processes
  • Hypocrisy
  • Norms
  • Social identity
  • Social influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Witness to hypocrisy : Reacting to ingroup hypocrites in the presence of others. / Gaffney, Amber M.; Hogg, Michael A.; Cooper, Joel; Stone, Jeffrey A.

In: Social Influence, Vol. 7, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 98-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaffney, Amber M. ; Hogg, Michael A. ; Cooper, Joel ; Stone, Jeffrey A. / Witness to hypocrisy : Reacting to ingroup hypocrites in the presence of others. In: Social Influence. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 98-112.
@article{6dcdebc98635404a9aa20529eee82b68,
title = "Witness to hypocrisy: Reacting to ingroup hypocrites in the presence of others",
abstract = "How is one's reaction to a fellow ingroup member's normative hypocrisy affected by the presence of a third party observer who is an ingroup member or an outgroup member? To investigate this question we experimentally manipulated the group membership and reaction of a third party to ingroup hypocrisy in a 2 × 2 design (N = 78) and measured participants' personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors that were normative of the ingroup. As predicted from a social identity analysis of the function of norms and prototypes in social influence processes, personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors was strongest when an outgroup member remarked negatively on the hypocrisy, and weakest when an outgroup member did not appear to notice the hypocrisy.",
keywords = "Deviance, Group processes, Hypocrisy, Norms, Social identity, Social influence",
author = "Gaffney, {Amber M.} and Hogg, {Michael A.} and Joel Cooper and Stone, {Jeffrey A}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15534510.2012.663741",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "98--112",
journal = "Social Influence",
issn = "1553-4510",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Witness to hypocrisy

T2 - Reacting to ingroup hypocrites in the presence of others

AU - Gaffney, Amber M.

AU - Hogg, Michael A.

AU - Cooper, Joel

AU - Stone, Jeffrey A

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - How is one's reaction to a fellow ingroup member's normative hypocrisy affected by the presence of a third party observer who is an ingroup member or an outgroup member? To investigate this question we experimentally manipulated the group membership and reaction of a third party to ingroup hypocrisy in a 2 × 2 design (N = 78) and measured participants' personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors that were normative of the ingroup. As predicted from a social identity analysis of the function of norms and prototypes in social influence processes, personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors was strongest when an outgroup member remarked negatively on the hypocrisy, and weakest when an outgroup member did not appear to notice the hypocrisy.

AB - How is one's reaction to a fellow ingroup member's normative hypocrisy affected by the presence of a third party observer who is an ingroup member or an outgroup member? To investigate this question we experimentally manipulated the group membership and reaction of a third party to ingroup hypocrisy in a 2 × 2 design (N = 78) and measured participants' personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors that were normative of the ingroup. As predicted from a social identity analysis of the function of norms and prototypes in social influence processes, personal endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors was strongest when an outgroup member remarked negatively on the hypocrisy, and weakest when an outgroup member did not appear to notice the hypocrisy.

KW - Deviance

KW - Group processes

KW - Hypocrisy

KW - Norms

KW - Social identity

KW - Social influence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858781805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858781805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15534510.2012.663741

DO - 10.1080/15534510.2012.663741

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 98

EP - 112

JO - Social Influence

JF - Social Influence

SN - 1553-4510

IS - 2

ER -