Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits?

Pelagie M Beeson, Kindle Rising, Jennifer Volk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Writing treatment that involved repeated copying and recall of target words was implemented with 8 individuals with severe aphasia in order to discern the best candidates for the treatment. Four of the 8 participants had strong positive responses to the copy and recall treatment (CART), relearning spellings for 15 targeted words during 10 to 12 weeks of treatment and up to 5 additional words during a month-long homework-based program. Of the 4 other participants, 3 learned the spellings of some target words but failed to reach criterion, and 1 had a poor treatment outcome. Insights regarding possible factors that limited success were gained by examination of individual responses to treatment as well as performance on the pretreatment assessments of semantic, phonological, and orthographic processes. Among the factors associated with success were (a) consistent, accurate completion of daily homework, (b) a relatively preserved semantic system, (c) the ability to discern words from nonwords, and (d) adequately preserved nonverbal visual problem-solving skills. Aphasia severity and minimal pretreatment spelling abilities did not necessarily limit the response to treatment. Participants with positive treatment outcomes demonstrated improved spelling of target words following repeated copying within a single treatment session, and accurately completed daily writing homework. Thus, pretreatment assessment and stimulability within initial treatment sessions provided indications of likely outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1038-1060
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Aphasia
homework
speech disorder
Semantics
semantics
ability
indication
candidacy
examination
performance
Spelling

Keywords

  • Agraphia
  • Aphasia
  • Aphasia treatment
  • Assessment
  • Treatment procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Writing treatment for severe aphasia : Who benefits? / Beeson, Pelagie M; Rising, Kindle; Volk, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 46, No. 5, 10.2003, p. 1038-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beeson, Pelagie M ; Rising, Kindle ; Volk, Jennifer. / Writing treatment for severe aphasia : Who benefits?. In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2003 ; Vol. 46, No. 5. pp. 1038-1060.
@article{d9b56934a3b04bd2ada87bb7d323452c,
title = "Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits?",
abstract = "Writing treatment that involved repeated copying and recall of target words was implemented with 8 individuals with severe aphasia in order to discern the best candidates for the treatment. Four of the 8 participants had strong positive responses to the copy and recall treatment (CART), relearning spellings for 15 targeted words during 10 to 12 weeks of treatment and up to 5 additional words during a month-long homework-based program. Of the 4 other participants, 3 learned the spellings of some target words but failed to reach criterion, and 1 had a poor treatment outcome. Insights regarding possible factors that limited success were gained by examination of individual responses to treatment as well as performance on the pretreatment assessments of semantic, phonological, and orthographic processes. Among the factors associated with success were (a) consistent, accurate completion of daily homework, (b) a relatively preserved semantic system, (c) the ability to discern words from nonwords, and (d) adequately preserved nonverbal visual problem-solving skills. Aphasia severity and minimal pretreatment spelling abilities did not necessarily limit the response to treatment. Participants with positive treatment outcomes demonstrated improved spelling of target words following repeated copying within a single treatment session, and accurately completed daily writing homework. Thus, pretreatment assessment and stimulability within initial treatment sessions provided indications of likely outcome.",
keywords = "Agraphia, Aphasia, Aphasia treatment, Assessment, Treatment procedures",
author = "Beeson, {Pelagie M} and Kindle Rising and Jennifer Volk",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2003/083)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1038--1060",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing treatment for severe aphasia

T2 - Who benefits?

AU - Beeson, Pelagie M

AU - Rising, Kindle

AU - Volk, Jennifer

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Writing treatment that involved repeated copying and recall of target words was implemented with 8 individuals with severe aphasia in order to discern the best candidates for the treatment. Four of the 8 participants had strong positive responses to the copy and recall treatment (CART), relearning spellings for 15 targeted words during 10 to 12 weeks of treatment and up to 5 additional words during a month-long homework-based program. Of the 4 other participants, 3 learned the spellings of some target words but failed to reach criterion, and 1 had a poor treatment outcome. Insights regarding possible factors that limited success were gained by examination of individual responses to treatment as well as performance on the pretreatment assessments of semantic, phonological, and orthographic processes. Among the factors associated with success were (a) consistent, accurate completion of daily homework, (b) a relatively preserved semantic system, (c) the ability to discern words from nonwords, and (d) adequately preserved nonverbal visual problem-solving skills. Aphasia severity and minimal pretreatment spelling abilities did not necessarily limit the response to treatment. Participants with positive treatment outcomes demonstrated improved spelling of target words following repeated copying within a single treatment session, and accurately completed daily writing homework. Thus, pretreatment assessment and stimulability within initial treatment sessions provided indications of likely outcome.

AB - Writing treatment that involved repeated copying and recall of target words was implemented with 8 individuals with severe aphasia in order to discern the best candidates for the treatment. Four of the 8 participants had strong positive responses to the copy and recall treatment (CART), relearning spellings for 15 targeted words during 10 to 12 weeks of treatment and up to 5 additional words during a month-long homework-based program. Of the 4 other participants, 3 learned the spellings of some target words but failed to reach criterion, and 1 had a poor treatment outcome. Insights regarding possible factors that limited success were gained by examination of individual responses to treatment as well as performance on the pretreatment assessments of semantic, phonological, and orthographic processes. Among the factors associated with success were (a) consistent, accurate completion of daily homework, (b) a relatively preserved semantic system, (c) the ability to discern words from nonwords, and (d) adequately preserved nonverbal visual problem-solving skills. Aphasia severity and minimal pretreatment spelling abilities did not necessarily limit the response to treatment. Participants with positive treatment outcomes demonstrated improved spelling of target words following repeated copying within a single treatment session, and accurately completed daily writing homework. Thus, pretreatment assessment and stimulability within initial treatment sessions provided indications of likely outcome.

KW - Agraphia

KW - Aphasia

KW - Aphasia treatment

KW - Assessment

KW - Treatment procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141789728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141789728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/083)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/083)

M3 - Article

C2 - 14575342

AN - SCOPUS:0141789728

VL - 46

SP - 1038

EP - 1060

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 5

ER -