Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma

Sammy C. Campbell, Michael P Habib, C. Shadle, R. T. Vagedes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of sustained-release theophylline, enprophylline and placebo in asthmatics. Methods: Investigators at 20 sites in North America entered 310 asthmatic patients into the 12 week trial. The initial dose of either active therapy was 150mg every 12 hours, and was increased to relieve respiratory symptoms as indicated. Serum levels were monitored by a separate physician at each site. The medication given, actual dose for the patient and serum levels were blinded to all other persons. The dose of each medication was adjusted depending on clinical criteria. The dose of theophylline was not increased if the serum level was found to be over 15mcg/ml. Evaluations consisted of periodic spirometry, assessment of status, patient evaluation of symptoms, daily peak flow measurements, and use of prn albuterol. Results: Optimal dosing for theophylline was generally 600 or 900 mg/day and for enprophylline was 900 or 1200 mg/day. Adverse events considered to be related to therapy occurred in 57% of theophylline, 63% of enprofylline and 35% of placebo patients. Significant improvements (p<0.05, ANOVA) in pulmonary function and clinical status were seen with both active drugs. No net decrease in numbers of puffs of albuterol was observed in the placebo group while significant decreases in the number of puffs were observed in the xanthine groups. Significant differences (p<0.05, chi-square) in clinical status after 12 weeks of therapy were observed for the xanthine treated patients. SYMPTOM CONTROL T E P Poor 0% 2% 13% Partial 22% 23% 25% Well or very well 78% 75% 62% T=theophylline (n=105), E=enprofylline (n=102), P=placebo (n=99) Conclusions: Xanthine therapy shifts the profile of treatment groups to better control of asthma symptoms, but with more side effects. The optimal dose of theophylline is generally 600 to 900 mg. Clinical Implications: If properly monitored, xanthine therapy may result in improved symptoms in asthma, especially if the patient feels that symptoms are poorly controlled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalChest
Volume110
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - Oct 1996

Fingerprint

Xanthine
Theophylline
Asthma
Placebos
Albuterol
Therapeutics
Serum
Symptom Assessment
Spirometry
North America
Analysis of Variance
Research Personnel
Physicians
Safety
Lung
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Campbell, S. C., Habib, M. P., Shadle, C., & Vagedes, R. T. (1996). Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma. Chest, 110(4 SUPPL.).

Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma. / Campbell, Sammy C.; Habib, Michael P; Shadle, C.; Vagedes, R. T.

In: Chest, Vol. 110, No. 4 SUPPL., 10.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campbell, SC, Habib, MP, Shadle, C & Vagedes, RT 1996, 'Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma', Chest, vol. 110, no. 4 SUPPL..
Campbell SC, Habib MP, Shadle C, Vagedes RT. Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma. Chest. 1996 Oct;110(4 SUPPL.).
Campbell, Sammy C. ; Habib, Michael P ; Shadle, C. ; Vagedes, R. T. / Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma. In: Chest. 1996 ; Vol. 110, No. 4 SUPPL.
@article{2fffbe3f9197451d9be43f753c2dc5c0,
title = "Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma",
abstract = "Purpose: We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of sustained-release theophylline, enprophylline and placebo in asthmatics. Methods: Investigators at 20 sites in North America entered 310 asthmatic patients into the 12 week trial. The initial dose of either active therapy was 150mg every 12 hours, and was increased to relieve respiratory symptoms as indicated. Serum levels were monitored by a separate physician at each site. The medication given, actual dose for the patient and serum levels were blinded to all other persons. The dose of each medication was adjusted depending on clinical criteria. The dose of theophylline was not increased if the serum level was found to be over 15mcg/ml. Evaluations consisted of periodic spirometry, assessment of status, patient evaluation of symptoms, daily peak flow measurements, and use of prn albuterol. Results: Optimal dosing for theophylline was generally 600 or 900 mg/day and for enprophylline was 900 or 1200 mg/day. Adverse events considered to be related to therapy occurred in 57{\%} of theophylline, 63{\%} of enprofylline and 35{\%} of placebo patients. Significant improvements (p<0.05, ANOVA) in pulmonary function and clinical status were seen with both active drugs. No net decrease in numbers of puffs of albuterol was observed in the placebo group while significant decreases in the number of puffs were observed in the xanthine groups. Significant differences (p<0.05, chi-square) in clinical status after 12 weeks of therapy were observed for the xanthine treated patients. SYMPTOM CONTROL T E P Poor 0{\%} 2{\%} 13{\%} Partial 22{\%} 23{\%} 25{\%} Well or very well 78{\%} 75{\%} 62{\%} T=theophylline (n=105), E=enprofylline (n=102), P=placebo (n=99) Conclusions: Xanthine therapy shifts the profile of treatment groups to better control of asthma symptoms, but with more side effects. The optimal dose of theophylline is generally 600 to 900 mg. Clinical Implications: If properly monitored, xanthine therapy may result in improved symptoms in asthma, especially if the patient feels that symptoms are poorly controlled.",
author = "Campbell, {Sammy C.} and Habib, {Michael P} and C. Shadle and Vagedes, {R. T.}",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Xanthine therapy results in improved clinical status of asthma

AU - Campbell, Sammy C.

AU - Habib, Michael P

AU - Shadle, C.

AU - Vagedes, R. T.

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - Purpose: We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of sustained-release theophylline, enprophylline and placebo in asthmatics. Methods: Investigators at 20 sites in North America entered 310 asthmatic patients into the 12 week trial. The initial dose of either active therapy was 150mg every 12 hours, and was increased to relieve respiratory symptoms as indicated. Serum levels were monitored by a separate physician at each site. The medication given, actual dose for the patient and serum levels were blinded to all other persons. The dose of each medication was adjusted depending on clinical criteria. The dose of theophylline was not increased if the serum level was found to be over 15mcg/ml. Evaluations consisted of periodic spirometry, assessment of status, patient evaluation of symptoms, daily peak flow measurements, and use of prn albuterol. Results: Optimal dosing for theophylline was generally 600 or 900 mg/day and for enprophylline was 900 or 1200 mg/day. Adverse events considered to be related to therapy occurred in 57% of theophylline, 63% of enprofylline and 35% of placebo patients. Significant improvements (p<0.05, ANOVA) in pulmonary function and clinical status were seen with both active drugs. No net decrease in numbers of puffs of albuterol was observed in the placebo group while significant decreases in the number of puffs were observed in the xanthine groups. Significant differences (p<0.05, chi-square) in clinical status after 12 weeks of therapy were observed for the xanthine treated patients. SYMPTOM CONTROL T E P Poor 0% 2% 13% Partial 22% 23% 25% Well or very well 78% 75% 62% T=theophylline (n=105), E=enprofylline (n=102), P=placebo (n=99) Conclusions: Xanthine therapy shifts the profile of treatment groups to better control of asthma symptoms, but with more side effects. The optimal dose of theophylline is generally 600 to 900 mg. Clinical Implications: If properly monitored, xanthine therapy may result in improved symptoms in asthma, especially if the patient feels that symptoms are poorly controlled.

AB - Purpose: We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of sustained-release theophylline, enprophylline and placebo in asthmatics. Methods: Investigators at 20 sites in North America entered 310 asthmatic patients into the 12 week trial. The initial dose of either active therapy was 150mg every 12 hours, and was increased to relieve respiratory symptoms as indicated. Serum levels were monitored by a separate physician at each site. The medication given, actual dose for the patient and serum levels were blinded to all other persons. The dose of each medication was adjusted depending on clinical criteria. The dose of theophylline was not increased if the serum level was found to be over 15mcg/ml. Evaluations consisted of periodic spirometry, assessment of status, patient evaluation of symptoms, daily peak flow measurements, and use of prn albuterol. Results: Optimal dosing for theophylline was generally 600 or 900 mg/day and for enprophylline was 900 or 1200 mg/day. Adverse events considered to be related to therapy occurred in 57% of theophylline, 63% of enprofylline and 35% of placebo patients. Significant improvements (p<0.05, ANOVA) in pulmonary function and clinical status were seen with both active drugs. No net decrease in numbers of puffs of albuterol was observed in the placebo group while significant decreases in the number of puffs were observed in the xanthine groups. Significant differences (p<0.05, chi-square) in clinical status after 12 weeks of therapy were observed for the xanthine treated patients. SYMPTOM CONTROL T E P Poor 0% 2% 13% Partial 22% 23% 25% Well or very well 78% 75% 62% T=theophylline (n=105), E=enprofylline (n=102), P=placebo (n=99) Conclusions: Xanthine therapy shifts the profile of treatment groups to better control of asthma symptoms, but with more side effects. The optimal dose of theophylline is generally 600 to 900 mg. Clinical Implications: If properly monitored, xanthine therapy may result in improved symptoms in asthma, especially if the patient feels that symptoms are poorly controlled.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750237259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750237259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 110

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -